Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
Gestalt Principles of Perception01:21

Gestalt Principles of Perception

Gestalt principles provide a framework for understanding how humans perceive objects as unified wholes within their context. These principles are essential in explaining the cognitive processes that make sense of complex visual stimuli by organizing them into coherent groups. One fundamental principle is proximity, which posits that objects located close to each other are perceived as a collective group. For instance, when dots are positioned near one another, the visual system interprets them...
Language and Cognition01:27

Language and Cognition

Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.
Higher Mental Functions of the Brain: Language01:10

Higher Mental Functions of the Brain: Language

Language is a system of communication that allows the expression of thoughts, ideas, and feelings. The brain processes language in both hemispheres.
Language formation and comprehension take place in the dominant hemisphere. The dominant hemisphere is responsible for understanding the meaning of spoken, written, or sign language, as well as the ability to communicate. For most people, the left hemisphere is the dominant one. The right hemisphere, then, gives tone and emotional context to the...
Introducing Social Perception01:29

Introducing Social Perception

Perceiving others accurately is fundamental to effective communication and relationship-building. Social perception, a key concept in social psychology, refers to the cognitive processes through which individuals gather and interpret information about others to understand their actions, intentions, and motivations. This process extends beyond spoken words and overt behaviors, incorporating subtle nonverbal cues and contextual factors.Nonverbal Cues and Their SignificanceNonverbal cues play a...
Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in different ways based on the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bilingual representation of multi-word phrases: Evidence from phrase-acceptability judgment in Chinese-English bilinguals.

Cognition·2026
Same author

The role of explicit contextual truth in counterfactual reasoning: ERP evidence from Chinese.

Brain and language·2026
Same author

Language choice and naming difficulty: Evidence from bilingual degraded picture naming.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same author

The role of semantics and phonology in bilingual picture naming: Evidence from the phono-translation effect.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2025
Same author

Revisiting bilingual processing: insights from L1 transfer in L2 acquisition.

Brain and language·2025
Same author

Language Production and Prediction in a Parallel Activation Model.

Topics in cognitive science·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 7, 2026

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

Perspective taking in language: integrating the spatial and action domains.

Madeleine E L Beveridge1, Martin J Pickering

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh Edinburgh, UK.

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
|September 25, 2013
PubMed
Summary

This study integrates spatial and action language perspective-taking, proposing a unified vocabulary and demonstrating that comprehenders can adopt various embodied action-perspectives beyond the agent. This flexibility aids dialogue by aligning situation models.

Keywords:
action perspectiveagencyembodied cognitionsituation modelsspatial perspective

More Related Videos

The (Spatial) Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
05:15

The (Spatial) Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 7, 2026

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

The (Spatial) Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
05:15

The (Spatial) Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Linguistics
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Language comprehension involves perspective-taking in both spatial and action domains.
  • Current research often separates spatial and action perspective-taking.
  • Embodied theories of language typically assume an agent's perspective for action descriptions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To integrate research on spatial and action perspective-taking.
  • To propose a unified and transparent vocabulary for perspective-taking research.
  • To argue for flexible embodied action-perspectives in language comprehension.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review integrating spatial and action language research.
  • Analysis of embodied theories of language comprehension.
  • Examination of evidence for flexible spatial perspective-taking.

Main Results:

  • Inconsistent vocabulary hinders integration of spatial and action perspective-taking.
  • Comprehenders can adopt agent, patient, or observer perspectives for action language.
  • Spatial perspective-taking is flexible and aids dialogue by aligning situation models.

Conclusions:

  • A unified vocabulary is needed to integrate spatial and action perspective-taking.
  • Embodied action-perspectives are more flexible than previously assumed.
  • Flexible perspective-taking in dialogue enhances shared situation models for action language simulation.