Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

Intrathecal Application of a Fluorescent Dye for the Identification of Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks in Cochlear Malformation
Published on: February 29, 2020
Meningitis and legal liability: an otolaryngology perspective
Peter F Svider1, Danielle M Blake1, Kiren P Sahni1
1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA.
Purpose:
Meningitis is a potential complication in otolaryngologic procedures and conditions. Severe sequelae make understanding factors involved in relevant malpractice litigation critical. We analyze pertinent litigation for awards, outcomes, patient demographic factors, and other alleged causes of malpractice.
Methods:
Pertinent jury verdict and settlement reports were examined using the Westlaw legal database (Thomson Reuters, New York, NY).
Results:
Twenty-three cases (60.5%) involved non-iatrogenic injuries, including inadequate treatment or failure to diagnose sinusitis or otitis media, while 15 (39.5%) involved iatrogenic cases, mostly rhinologic procedures. 36.8% of cases were resolved for the defendant, 28.9% with juries awarding damages, and 34.2% with settlements. Although not statistically significant, mean damages awarded were higher than settlements ($2.1 vs. 1.5M, p=0.056), and cases involving pediatric patients were more likely to be resolved with payment than those with adult litigants (80.0% vs. 52.2%, p=0.08 respectively). Other frequent alleged factors included permanent deficits (63.2%), requiring additional surgery (41.1%), death (34.2%), cognitive deficits (21.2%), deafness (15.8%), and inadequate informed consent (33.0% of iatrogenic cases).
Conclusions:
Practitioners facing litigation related to meningitis may wish to consider these findings, notably for cases involving death or permanent functional deficits, as cases with out of court settlements tended to be resolved with lower payments. Cases involving misdiagnosis may be more likely to be resolved with payment compared with iatrogenic cases. By understanding the issues detailed in this analysis and including them in the informed consent process for patients undergoing rhinologic and otologic procedures, otolaryngologists may potentially improve patient safety and decrease liability.
Insights
Malpractice litigation involving meningitis complications in otolaryngology often stems from misdiagnosis rather than surgical errors. Settlements for pediatric cases and those with severe outcomes like death or permanent deficits may involve lower payments.
Area of Science:
- Otolaryngology
- Medical Malpractice Law
- Patient Safety
Background:
- Meningitis is a serious complication that can arise from otolaryngologic procedures and conditions.
- Understanding malpractice litigation factors is crucial for managing severe sequelae.
- Analysis of legal cases provides insights into patient outcomes and alleged causes of action.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze malpractice litigation related to meningitis in otolaryngology.
- To identify factors influencing awards, outcomes, and patient demographics.
- To understand alleged causes of malpractice and their resolution.
Main Methods:
- A review of pertinent jury verdict and settlement reports was conducted.
- The Westlaw legal database was utilized for case identification.
- Data on case outcomes, alleged causes, and patient factors were extracted and analyzed.
Main Results:
- Non-iatrogenic injuries (e.g., sinusitis, otitis media misdiagnosis) were more common (60.5%) than iatrogenic cases (39.5%).
- 36.8% of cases favored the defendant, while 28.9% resulted in awarded damages and 34.2% in settlements.
- Frequent allegations included permanent deficits (63.2%), need for further surgery (41.1%), death (34.2%), and inadequate informed consent (33.0% in iatrogenic cases).
Conclusions:
- Cases involving misdiagnosis may be more likely to result in payment than iatrogenic cases.
- Settlements, particularly for cases involving death or permanent deficits, tended to involve lower payments.
- Improved informed consent and understanding litigation trends can enhance patient safety and reduce otolaryngologist liability.
Related Concept Videos
Bacterial Meningitis I: Introduction
Torts I
Intentional...
Bacterial Meningitis II: Pathophysiology
Torts III
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.
Viral Meningitis
Brain Abscess l: Introduction
