Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

A New Hybrid Quantitative Evaluation Model for Axillary Junctional Hemorrhage in Swine
Published on: December 6, 2024
Detecting postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma from administrative data: the performance of the AHRQ Patient Safety
Garth H Utter1, Patricia A Zrelak, Ruth Baron
1Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA.
Background:
Patient Safety Indicator (PSI) 9, "postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma" (PHH), of the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality has been considered for public quality of care reporting. We sought to evaluate its performance in detecting true complications.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional study of hospitalizations that met PSI 9 eligibility criteria. We sampled records flagged positive and negative by PSI 9 from a diverse set of 31 hospitals between February 2006, and June 2009. Trained abstractors reviewed medical records using standard instruments. We determined the sensitivity, specificity, and positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values of the indicator.
Results:
Of 181 analyzable records flagged by PSI 9, 168 (93%; weighted PPV, 95% [95% confidence interval (CI), 90-98%]) involved an accurately coded event, but only 126 (70%; weighted PPV, 78% [95% CI, 58-90%]) represented true PHH. Thirty-two false positives involved only intraoperative hemorrhage. Among true positives, hypotension occurred in 28% and death attributed to the PHH in 4%. Thirty-two of 281 records flagged negative by PSI 9 (but enriched with questionably negative records) represented true PHH. The indicator's sensitivity was 42% (95% CI, 23-64%), specificity 99.9% (95% CI, 99.8-100%), and NPV 99.7% (95% CI, 99.0-99.9%). Modifying the indicator to include additional procedure codes improved both sensitivity (85% [95% CI, 67-94%]) and PPV (76% [95% CI, 60-88%]).
Conclusion:
PSI 9 holds promise in detecting serious, possibly preventable complications. The indicator might be improved by specification of the 998.11 hemorrhage code to exclude purely intraoperative events and addition of procedure codes to the indicator's numerator criteria.
Related Concept Videos
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Assessment of apical radial pulse
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation
