Positional plagiocephaly: an analysis of the literature on the effectiveness of current guidelines
Faris Shweikeh1, Miriam Nuño, Moise Danielpour
1Department of Neurosurgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center; and.
Insights
Positional plagiocephaly (PP) is increasingly common. Current guidelines for prevention and management may be difficult for parents and clinicians to follow, necessitating improved education and modified recommendations for better outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Public Health
Background:
- Positional plagiocephaly (PP) incidence is rising.
- Existing literature on PP guidelines, parental practices, and epidemiology was reviewed.
Purpose of the Study:
- Assess the effectiveness of current recommendations for positional plagiocephaly (PP).
- Review current treatment options and recent studies on PP.
Main Methods:
- Comprehensive literature search conducted.
- Included studies on guidelines, recommendations, parental/clinician practices, and epidemiology.
Main Results:
- PP incidence and risk factors are known, but management and developmental delay associations are debated.
- Current American Association of Pediatrics guidelines may be challenging for parents and clinicians.
- Certain populations (lower education, socioeconomic status) are disproportionately affected; marketing of treatments is a concern.
Conclusions:
- Enhanced public awareness and education are crucial, with targeted attention for vulnerable populations.
- Guidelines and recommendations require modification for better parental and clinician understanding.
- Clearer guidelines, early education, and close monitoring are key for PP prevention and management.
Object:
Positional plagiocephaly (PP) has been on the rise in recent years. In this review, the authors' aim was to assess the effectiveness of current recommendations to parents on this exceedingly common problem through a comprehensive literature search. Additionally, the current treatment options and the most recent studies on PP are reviewed.
Methods:
A search of the existing literature was conducted to obtain all relevant studies on guidelines, recommendations, parental and clinician practices, and epidemiological aspects.
Results:
Although the incidence and risk factors for PP have been well delineated, there continues to be debates on its management and association with developmental delays. Current guidelines and recommendations on prevention set by the American Association of Pediatrics may not be easily followed by both parents and clinicians. There is also evidence that certain populations, including those with lower education, socioeconomic status, and in particular geographic regions may be more affected by the condition. Additionally, the marketing and financial aspects of PP treatments exist and should be addressed.
Conclusions:
Better awareness and education are necessary to inform the population as a whole, although certain populations should be given special attention. Additionally, current guidelines and recommendations can be modified to foster a better grasp of the condition by both parents and clinicians. Adjusting current recommendations, introducing initiatives, and offering elaborate educational campaigns would help deliver these aims. Educating parents on PP as early as possible through clearer guidelines and close monitoring is central to preventing and managing this common condition.
