Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026
Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
Published on: July 21, 2020
Fundus-driven perimetry (microperimetry) compared to conventional static automated perimetry: similarities,
Jennifer H Acton1, Vivienne C Greenstein
1School of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Maindy Road, Cardiff, Wales, CF24 4LU, United Kingdom.
Abstract:
Fundus-driven perimetry, commonly known as microperimetry, is a technique for measuring visual field sensitivity, whilst simultaneously viewing the fundus. In this article, we review the technique, focusing on the MP-1 microperimeter (Nidek Instruments, Inc, Padua, Italy); we compare it with conventional static automated perimetry, emphasizing the importance of understanding the effects of the different stimulus conditions and data analyses on the interpretation of microperimetry data. The clinical applications of the technique, in the evaluation of functional and structural changes that accompany retinal diseases, are illustrated by its use in patients with age-related macular degeneration, Stargardt disease, and retinitis pigmentosa. In addition, the advantages and limitations of the technique are summarized.
Insights
Microperimetry, a fundus-driven visual field test, offers detailed insights into retinal diseases. This review compares it to traditional methods, highlighting its clinical applications and limitations.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Medical Technology
Background:
- Microperimetry integrates visual field testing with fundus imaging.
- Conventional static automated perimetry lacks simultaneous fundus visualization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review fundus-driven perimetry (microperimetry) and its clinical applications.
- To compare microperimetry with conventional static automated perimetry.
- To emphasize the impact of stimulus conditions and data analysis on microperimetry interpretation.
Main Methods:
- Review of microperimetry technique, focusing on the MP-1 microperimeter.
- Comparison with conventional static automated perimetry.
- Illustration of clinical applications in retinal diseases.
Main Results:
- Microperimetry provides simultaneous visual field sensitivity and fundus viewing.
- The technique is valuable for evaluating functional and structural changes in retinal diseases.
- Understanding stimulus conditions and data analysis is crucial for accurate interpretation.
Conclusions:
- Microperimetry is a valuable tool for assessing retinal diseases like AMD, Stargardt disease, and retinitis pigmentosa.
- The technique offers advantages over conventional perimetry by correlating visual function with retinal structure.
- Awareness of its advantages and limitations is essential for optimal clinical use.
