Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
A web-based tool to support shared decision making for people with a psychotic disorder: randomized controlled trial
Lian van der Krieke1, Ando C Emerencia, Nynke Boonstra
1University of Groningen, University Medical Center, University Center for Psychiatry, Groningen, Netherlands. j.a.j.van.der.krieke@umcg.nl.
This study found that a Web-based decision aid did not increase patient involvement in medical decision-making for individuals with psychotic disorders. Implementation challenges and low response rates may have impacted the results of this electronic decision aid trial.
Area of Science:
- Psychiatry and Mental Health
- Health Informatics
- Patient Engagement
Background:
- Policy initiatives promote electronic decision aids to enhance patient participation in healthcare.
- Evidence is needed to validate the effectiveness of these tools in clinical settings, particularly for improving patient involvement and outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate a Web-based intervention designed to facilitate shared decision-making among patients with psychotic disorders through a randomized controlled trial.
- To conduct a process evaluation of the intervention's implementation and impact on patient involvement.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled trial was conducted in a Dutch mental health institution with 250 patients with psychosis (first episode and chronic).
- The intervention group (n=124) received access to a Web-based decision tool, while the control group (n=126) received usual care.
- Patient-perceived involvement in decision-making was the primary outcome, measured by the COMRADE scale. Process evaluation included surveys, interviews, and observations.
Main Results:
- Only 38.7% of patients accessed the Web-based decision aid, with most utilizing its full features.
- No significant differences were observed in perceived involvement in medical decision-making between the intervention and control groups.
- Process evaluation indicated that the intervention was not optimally integrated into routine clinical practice.
Conclusions:
- While many patients with psychotic disorders, including those with first-episode or chronic conditions, can engage with electronic decision aids, this study did not demonstrate increased patient involvement.
- Potential reasons for the lack of significant findings include suboptimal implementation and a low participant response rate.
- Further research is needed to optimize the integration and effectiveness of electronic decision aids in mental healthcare.
More Related Videos
10:32Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
Published on: April 23, 2014
13:20Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
Published on: December 5, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Psychosis: Goals of Pharmacotherapy
Psychosurgery
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...