Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

10:20
Linking Predation Risk, Herbivore Physiological Stress and Microbial Decomposition of Plant Litter
Published on: March 12, 2013
13.7K
Nonconsumptive effects in a multiple predator system reduce the foraging efficiency of a keystone predator
Jon M Davenport1, David R Chalcraft
1Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana Missoula, Montana, 59812.
Ecology and Evolution
|October 9, 2013
Summary
Predator interactions matter. Non-consumptive effects (NCE) from dragonflies reduced newt foraging (consumptive effect, CE), impacting prey mortality predictions. Accounting for these NCE-CE interactions improves ecological models.
Area of Science:
- Ecology
- Predator-prey dynamics
- Behavioral ecology
Background:
- Non-consumptive effects (NCE) of predators significantly impact prey demographics, comparable to consumptive effects (CE).
- Interactions between NCE and CE of multiple predator species on shared prey are less understood.
- Predicting combined predator impacts on prey mortality requires understanding these complex interactions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how the NCE of one predator influences the CE of another predator on a shared prey.
- To evaluate if incorporating NCE-CE interactions improves predictions of combined predator effects on prey mortality.
- To assess the impact of predator interactions on the foraging success and keystone role of predators.
Main Methods:
- Experimental setup using larval dragonflies, adult newts, and tadpole prey.
- Quantification of consumptive effects (CE) and non-consumptive effects (NCE) for each predator.
- Measurement of how NCE from one predator altered the CE of the second predator.
- Comparison of observed combined predator effects with four predictive models.
Main Results:
- Dragonfly NCE (increased tadpole hiding) reduced newt CE (foraging success).
- Newt NCE altered tadpole behavior but did not affect dragonfly CE.
- The combined effect of both predators on tadpole mortality was better predicted when NCE-CE interactions were considered.
Conclusions:
- Interactions between predator consumptive and non-consumptive effects are crucial for accurate ecological predictions.
- The presence of other predators can compromise the foraging efficiency and keystone role of a predator.
- Incorporating NCE-CE interactions into models enhances the predictability of multi-predator impacts on prey populations.
Keywords:
Amphibianconsumptive effectsfood webkeystone predatormultiple predatormultiplicative risk modelnonconsumptive effectstemporary pondsMore Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Predator-Prey Interactions
17.2K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
17.2K
Keystone Species
20.9K
Measures of species biodiversity, such as richness (i.e., the number of species present) and evenness (i.e., their relative abundance), describe an ecological community’s structure. Many factors affect community structure, including abiotic factors (e.g., sunlight and nutrients), disturbances (e.g., fire or flood), species interactions (e.g., predation or competition), and chance events (e.g., foreign species invasion). Certain species—such as keystone species—also play a...
20.9K
Optimal Foraging
11.9K
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
11.9K
Microbial Interactions: Predation
76
Microbial predation refers to the process by which one microorganism kills and consumes another to obtain nutrients and energy. It encompasses both bacterial and protozoan predators. This interaction plays a crucial role in shaping microbial communities and regulating nutrient cycling.Bacterial Predators: Epibiotic vs. EndobioticBacterial predators are classified based on their mode of attack as either epibiotic or endobiotic. Epibiotic predators, such as Vampirococcus, attach to the surface of...
76
Trophic Efficiency
19.7K
Trophic level transfer efficiency (TLTE) is a measure of the total energy transfer from one trophic level to the next. Due to extensive energy loss as metabolic heat, an average of only 10% of the original energy obtained is passed on to the next level. This pattern of energy loss severely limits the possible number of trophic levels in a food chain.
19.7K
Frequency-dependent Selection
20.2K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
20.2K

