Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Timing and Consequences on Behavior01:08

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

961
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective. 
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
961
Self-Regulation01:25

Self-Regulation

361
Self-regulation, also known as self-control, encompasses a range of cognitive and behavioral processes that allow individuals to adjust their internal states and outward actions to align with socially acceptable norms and long-term goals. It plays a fundamental role in adaptive functioning, from resisting impulsive behaviors to persisting through challenging tasks. While its benefits are widely recognized, self-regulation is not limitless. Muraven and Baumeister's theory posits that...
361
Persuasion Strategies01:52

Persuasion Strategies

29.8K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
29.8K
Instinctive Drift01:05

Instinctive Drift

1.6K
Instinctive drift refers to the tendency of animals to revert to their innate behaviors despite repeated reinforcement. Breland and Breland demonstrated this concept in an experiment with a raccoon. The raccoon was trained to pick up two coins and place them in a container in exchange for food. Initially, the raccoon learned to associate the coins with food, making them a conditioned stimulus or a substitute for food. However, over time, the raccoon became less willing to put the coins into the...
1.6K
Social Exchange Theory02:06

Social Exchange Theory

26.4K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
26.4K
Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

7.9K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Debiasing training reduces confirmation bias in national risk analysts.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

GenAI and the psychology of work.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2025
Same author

A contest study to reduce attractiveness-based discrimination in social judgment.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2024
Same author

Financial Mindfulness: A Scale.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2024
Same author

People see more of their biases in algorithms.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2024
Same author

Human bias in algorithm design.

Nature human behaviour·2023
Same journal

Bidirectional associations between fathers' food parenting practices and children's dietary intake.

Appetite·2026
Same journal

Associations Between Child Temperament, Weight Status, and Snack Food Consumption in a Diverse Sample of Young Children.

Appetite·2026
Same journal

Hedonic and practicality beliefs form a behaviour-proximal core associated with red and processed meat intake: An attitude network analysis.

Appetite·2026
Same journal

Why we eat: Development and validation of a 7-factor Motivations for Eating Profile (MEP-7).

Appetite·2026
Same journal

Mealtime satisfaction in public nursing homes: Associations with sensory, foodservice, and dining-room environment factors.

Appetite·2026
Same journal

Is the association between food insecurity and depression mediated by diet?

Appetite·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 7, 2026

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

15.1K

Does liking or wanting determine repeat consumption delay?

Emily N Garbinsky1, Carey K Morewedge, Baba Shiv

  • 1Stanford University, Graduate School of Business, 655 Knight Way, Stanford, CA 94305, United States.

Appetite
|October 10, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Memory for liking, not wanting, predicts how long until people consume food again. This finding highlights the crucial role of positive taste experiences in repeat food consumption and future eating behaviors.

Keywords:
LikingRecency effectsRepeat consumption delayWanting

More Related Videos

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

7.6K
A General Method for Evaluating Incubation of Sucrose Craving in Rats
12:44

A General Method for Evaluating Incubation of Sucrose Craving in Rats

Published on: November 4, 2011

13.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 7, 2026

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

15.1K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

7.6K
A General Method for Evaluating Incubation of Sucrose Craving in Rats
12:44

A General Method for Evaluating Incubation of Sucrose Craving in Rats

Published on: November 4, 2011

13.0K

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral science
  • Neuroscience of eating
  • Consumer psychology

Background:

  • Liking and wanting are distinct but correlated psychological processes influencing consumption.
  • Understanding factors that regulate the delay between consumption episodes is key to explaining eating patterns.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether liking or wanting predicts the delay between food consumption episodes.
  • To determine the relative influence of memory for liking versus wanting on future consumption timing.

Main Methods:

  • Experiment 1: Assessed liking and wanting at the end of a consumption experience and tracked subsequent consumption delays.
  • Experiment 2: Manipulated the decrease in liking due to repeated consumption to observe its effect on delay.

Main Results:

  • Memory for liking, not wanting, significantly predicted the number of days until a food was consumed again.
  • Mitigating the decline in liking after repeated consumption removed the effect on consumption delay.

Conclusions:

  • End-episode liking, and its memory, is a stronger determinant of future consumption timing than wanting.
  • These findings suggest that positive affective experiences significantly influence the regulation of food intake frequency.