Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

A Neuroscientific Approach to the Examination of Concussions in Student-Athletes
Published on: December 8, 2014
Neuropsychologist experts and neurolaw: cases, controversies, and admissibility challenges
1Diplomate in Clinical Neuropsychology and Practicing Attorney, Independent Practice, 31030 Foxridge Lane, Eugene, OR, 97405, U.S.A.
Abstract:
Clinical neuropsychologists engage increasingly in forensic consulting activities because such expert opinions are generally relevant, reliable and helpful in resolving certain legal claims, especially those related to traumatic brain injury. Consequently, practitioners of law, medicine and psychology would benefit from understanding the nature of neuropsychological evidence, the standards for its admissibility, and its expanding role in neurolaw. This article reviews important evidentiary rules regulating relevance, preliminary questions, and expert testimony, while tracing federal key court decisions and progeny. Civil and criminal cases are detailed to illustrate the application of these rules and case law to neuropsychological evidence, with suggestions for overcoming motions to exclude such evidence. Expert neuropsychologists have a role in forensic consultation on brain trauma cases, even as the interdisciplinary dialog and understanding among law, medicine, and psychology continues to expand.
Related Concept Videos
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function...
Neuroplasticity
False Memories
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
Cognitive Enhancers: Cholinesterase Inhibitors and NMDA Receptor Antagonists
Cognitivism
Previously dominated by behaviorism, which prioritized observable behaviors and largely ignored mental processes, psychology transformed in the 1950s. Cognitive psychologists argue that understanding how we think and process...
Language and Cognition

