Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

8.7K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
8.7K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

94.0K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
94.0K
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

681
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
681
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

11.2K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
11.2K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

975
975
Random Sampling Method01:09

Random Sampling Method

11.9K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest. Among the various sampling methods used by...
11.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Association between VA providers' reported use of care strategies and emergence delirium: a national retrospective cross-sectional survey.

Perioperative medicine (London, England)·2026
Same author

Polysomnographic insights into the attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and obstructive sleep apnea connection in children.

Frontiers in sleep·2025
Same author

Acute Alcohol Intoxication and Chronic Alcohol Use Increase Risk of Infection After Open Tibia Fractures.

Orthopedics·2025
Same author

Pragmatic trial of a virtual dementia collaborative care management program: protocol for the Aging Brain Care Virtual (ABCV) program.

BMJ open·2025
Same author

Role of trait impulsivity in distracted driving and walking: A Cluster analysis.

Journal of safety research·2025
Same author

Impact of Neighborhood Disadvantage on Gastrointestinal Morbidity in Extremely Low Birthweight Infants.

Cureus·2025
Same journal

Latency and persistence of renewal in an intensive outpatient clinic.

Journal of applied behavior analysis·2026
Same journal

The effect of varied versus constant high-probability instructional sequences on cooperation.

Journal of applied behavior analysis·2026
Same journal

Relations between heart rate and precursors: A replication and extension of prior research.

Journal of applied behavior analysis·2026
Same journal

Integrating five linear trend techniques into performance-criteria-based effect size measurements: Impressions and recommendations.

Journal of applied behavior analysis·2026
Same journal

Functional analysis and treatment of higher level restricted repetitive behavior displayed by individuals with autism.

Journal of applied behavior analysis·2026
Same journal

Contingency drives children's vocal behavior.

Journal of applied behavior analysis·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 6, 2026

Analyzing Melts and Fluids from Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Simulations with the UMD Package
06:37

Analyzing Melts and Fluids from Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Simulations with the UMD Package

Published on: September 17, 2021

6.0K

Interval sampling methods and measurement error: a computer simulation.

Oliver Wirth1, James Slaven, Matthew A Taylor

  • 1National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
|October 16, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study simulated interval sampling methods to quantify measurement error. Findings reveal strengths and weaknesses, aiding selection of appropriate methods for behavioral assessments.

Keywords:
interval samplingmeasurement errormomentary time samplingobservationobservational datapartial-interval recordingsimulationwhole-interval recording

More Related Videos

Simulation of Human-induced Vibrations Based on the Characterized In-field Pedestrian Behavior
10:52

Simulation of Human-induced Vibrations Based on the Characterized In-field Pedestrian Behavior

Published on: April 13, 2016

8.1K
Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

15.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 6, 2026

Analyzing Melts and Fluids from Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Simulations with the UMD Package
06:37

Analyzing Melts and Fluids from Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Simulations with the UMD Package

Published on: September 17, 2021

6.0K
Simulation of Human-induced Vibrations Based on the Characterized In-field Pedestrian Behavior
10:52

Simulation of Human-induced Vibrations Based on the Characterized In-field Pedestrian Behavior

Published on: April 13, 2016

8.1K
Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

15.1K

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Science
  • Research Methodology
  • Psychometrics

Background:

  • Interval sampling methods are widely used in behavioral observation.
  • Accurate measurement is crucial for valid behavioral assessments.
  • Previous research has identified some limitations of these methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify measurement error in interval sampling methods.
  • To provide a comprehensive analysis of momentary time sampling, partial-interval recording, and whole-interval recording.
  • To guide the selection of optimal sampling methods for behavioral research.

Main Methods:

  • Computer simulations were used to model interval sampling techniques.
  • Simulations varied observation period, interval duration, and event duration.
  • Error measures were calculated across multiple simulation runs to assess variability.

Main Results:

  • Confirmed previously reported characteristics of interval sampling.
  • Identified new strengths and weaknesses for each method.
  • Generated error tables to compare sampling method accuracy.

Conclusions:

  • The choice of interval sampling method significantly impacts measurement error.
  • Understanding method-specific error is essential for accurate behavioral data collection.
  • The study provides empirical guidance for selecting appropriate behavioral observation techniques.