Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing
Published on: April 4, 2025
The interaction between stimulus-driven and goal-driven orienting as revealed by eye movements
Daniel Schreij1, Sander A Los1, Jan Theeuwes1
1VU University Amsterdam.
Attention capture can be stimulus-driven or goal-driven. While manual responses appear additive, eye movements reveal interactions between these attention capture types, suggesting a shared orienting mechanism.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Neuroscience
- Human Attention Research
Background:
- Attention is typically understood as being captured either by external stimuli (stimulus-driven) or internal goals (goal-driven).
- Previous research often shows additive effects on manual reaction time (RT) when both capture types are present, implying independent processes.
- Manual RT may mask complex interactions due to its reflection of multiple processing stages.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate potential interactions between stimulus-driven and goal-driven attention capture.
- To determine if manual response time accurately reflects the interplay between different attention capture mechanisms.
- To explore the underlying neural mechanisms by comparing eye movement data with manual responses.
Main Methods:
- Participants performed a visual search task for a red letter target.
- Contingent capture was manipulated using an irrelevant red cue preceding the target display.
- Stimulus-driven capture was manipulated by the simultaneous onset of an irrelevant new object with the target display.
- Both saccadic eye movements and manual responses (reaction time) were recorded.
Main Results:
- Eye movement data demonstrated significant interactions between cue validity and object onset on saccade trajectories.
- In contrast, manual response times showed additive effects, with no significant interaction observed.
- These findings suggest that manual RT may not fully capture the dynamic interplay between attention capture types.
Conclusions:
- Both stimulus-driven and goal-driven attention capture likely influence a common spatial orienting mechanism.
- Interactions between attention capture types are observable at the level of eye movements but not manual RT.
- A descriptive computational model was developed to explain the dynamics of these shared orienting processes.
More Related Videos
09:27Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills
Published on: January 19, 2024
06:46Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
Published on: March 18, 2019