Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

Standardized Technique of Aortic Valve Re-implantation for Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement
Published on: December 11, 2017
Clinical outcome of redo operation on aortic root
Naoto Fukunaga1, Tadaaki Koyama, Yasunobu Konishi
1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, 2-1-1 Minatojimaminamimachi, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 650-0047, Japan, naotowakimachi@hotmail.co.jp.
Background:
With the increasing use of biologic conduits or bioprosthetic valve, the number of patients who require redo operation on aortic root increased.
Methods:
In the past 22 years, 14 patients underwent redo operation on aortic root. The mean age was 61.9 ± 14.8 years. Previous operations were full root replacement with stentless valve (n = 4), aortic root replacement with subcoronary technique (n = 3) and Bentall operation (n = 7). The operation interval was 5.4 ± 6.4 years. Indication for redo operation included structural valve deterioration (n = 6), prosthetic valve endocarditis (n = 4), perivalvular leakage (n = 2), dilatation of sinus of Valsalva (n = 1) and dehiscence of proximal anastomosis line (n = 1). Mean follow-up period was 5.3 ± 5.2 years.
Results:
Present operations were full root replacement with stentless valve (n = 5) and Bentall operation (n = 9). There was one in-hospital death (7.1 %) caused by arrhythmia. Postoperative complications included implantation of permanent pacemaker (n = 3), arrhythmia (n = 2) and re-intubation (n = 1). The 5-year survival was 92.9 ± 6.9%. Freedom from redo aortic operation at 5 years was 100%.
Conclusion:
Redo operation on aortic root can be performed with acceptable in-hospital mortality and good late survival.
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management

