Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026
Author Spotlight: Segmentation and VR for Advanced Neurovascular Interventions
Published on: April 5, 2024
Accuracy of 3D fluoroscopy in cranial stereotactic surgery: a comparative study in phantoms and patients
Lutz M Weise1, Sebastian Eibach, Matthias Setzer
1Department of Neurosurgery, Goethe University Frankfurt, Schleusenweg 2-16, 60528, Frankfurt, Germany, lutz.weise@med.uni-frankfurt.de.
Background:
To assess the precision and accuracy of 3D fluoroscopy (XT) in phantoms and patients compared to computed tomography (CT) in localizing stereotactic probes.
Methods:
Approval was obtained from the institutional research ethics board. The prospective phantom study was compared to a retrospective patient cohort. Accuracy was assessed by the mean error and precision by the mean dispersion between XT and CT with a cubic or a skull phantom containing metallic spheres installed on plates or along trajectories. Significance was assessed by Friedman's and Levene's test. Secondary endpoints were Euclidean error, other influences e.g. installed frame and radiation exposure.
Results:
A total of 3,342 distances were assessed in 17 XT and 13 CT phantom scans. The cubic phantom showed mean distance errors of 0.33 mm (SD + -0.46 mm) for XT compared to 0.19 mm (SD + -0.83 mm) for CT scans (p = 0.0004) and a dispersion of 0.22 mm (XT) and 0.70 mm (CT). The dispersion was 0.36 mm with and 0.63 mm without a stereotactic frame (p < 0.0001). The mean Euclidean error was 0.72 mm (SD + -0.59 mm) in the skull phantom and 1.34 mm (SD + -0.82 mm) in the patient cohort. The effective dose was 0.65 mSv for the XT and 1.12 mSv for the CT.
Conclusions:
The accuracy of XT imaging in phantoms revealed a slightly lower accuracy but higher precision than the CT. The overall accuracy of XT was higher than that of the stereotactic frame allowing stereotactic localization with about half of the effective dose of a CT-scan.
