Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

Post-Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure in Closed-chest Coronary Occlusion/Reperfusion Model in Göttingen Minipigs and Landrace Pigs
Published on: April 17, 2021
Revascularization in heart failure in the post-STICH era
Saurabh Jha1, Scott D Flamm, Deborah H Kwon
1Cardiovascular Imaging, Imaging Institute, and Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Mail Code J1-5 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Insights
Myocardial viability testing helps predict heart function recovery after coronary artery disease treatment. However, its role in guiding revascularization decisions remains controversial, necessitating further high-resolution imaging studies.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Imaging
- Heart Failure Research
Background:
- Ischemic cardiomyopathy, resulting from coronary artery disease, causes left ventricular dysfunction through myocyte death, stunning, and hibernation.
- Myocardial viability testing is employed to assess the potential for contractile function recovery post-revascularization in these patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the role of myocardial viability testing in predicting outcomes after revascularization in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.
- To address the controversy surrounding viability testing's clinical utility, particularly in light of the STICH trial substudy findings.
Main Methods:
- Review of observational studies and the STICH trial viability substudy.
- Discussion of limitations in previous study designs and implementation.
- Highlighting the need for randomized controlled trials with advanced imaging modalities.
Main Results:
- Observational studies suggested value in viability testing.
- The STICH viability substudy indicated that viability testing did not predict differential outcomes based on treatment, with a trend towards better survival in non-viable myocardium post-revascularization.
Conclusions:
- The clinical utility of myocardial viability testing in guiding revascularization for ischemic cardiomyopathy remains debated due to conflicting evidence and study limitations.
- High-resolution imaging techniques like positron emission tomography and cardiac MRI are crucial for future randomized trials to clarify the benefits of revascularization based on myocardial viability.
Abstract:
Left ventricular (LV) dysfunction caused by ischemia secondary to coronary artery disease results not only from cardiac myocyte death but also from stunning and hibernation, which are potentially reversible phenomena. Myocardial viability testing is often used in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy to predict recovery of contractile function after revascularization. Although several observational studies have supported the use of viability testing, the Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart failure (STICH) viability substudy challenged its role in clinical decision-making, as viability testing in this study did not predict differential outcomes based on treatment type, and there was a trend toward increased survival in patients with no viability who underwent revascularization. However, the results of the STICH trial have caused controversy because of limitations in study design and implementation. Randomized controlled trials using high-resolution modalities such as positron emission tomography or delayed hyperenhancement cardiac magnetic resonance are needed to determine the incremental benefits that revascularization may afford based on myocardial viability.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care

