Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Classification of Signals01:30

Classification of Signals

1.6K
In signal processing, signals are classified based on various characteristics: continuous-time versus discrete-time, periodic versus aperiodic, analog versus digital, and causal versus noncausal. Each category highlights distinct properties crucial for understanding and manipulating signals.
A continuous-time signal holds a value at every instant in time, representing information seamlessly. In contrast, a discrete-time signal holds values only at specific moments, often denoted as x(n), where...
1.6K
Determination of Expected Frequency01:08

Determination of Expected Frequency

1.8K
Suppose one wants to test independence between the two variables of a contingency table. The values in the table constitute the observed frequencies of the dataset. But how does one determine the expected frequency of the dataset? One of the important assumptions is that the two variables are independent, which means the variables do not influence each other. For independent variables, the statistical probability of any event involving both variables is calculated by multiplying the individual...
1.8K
Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

2.5K
The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
2.5K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

2.0K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
2.0K
Probability Histograms01:17

Probability Histograms

8.7K
A probability histogram is a visual representation of a probability distribution. Similar a typical histogram, the probability histogram consists of contiguous (adjoining) boxes. It has both a horizontal axis and a vertical axis. The horizontal axis is labeled with what the data represents. The vertical axis is labeled with probability. Each rectangular bar in the histogram is 1 unit wide, which suggests that the area under each bar equals the probability, P(x), where x is 1, 2, 3, and so on.
8.7K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.4K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bayesian evaluation for latent variable models: A tutorial on computing information criteria and bayes factors with the r package bleval.

Psychological methods·2026
Same author

Computational modeling in developmental science.

Advances in child development and behavior·2026
Same author

Predictive value of real-time memory tests in identifying alcohol-induced blackouts in situ.

Addiction (Abingdon, England)·2026
Same author

Bayesian Estimation of Normal and Probit Psychometric Models.

Psychometrika·2026
Same author

Human-AI collaboration: trade-offs between performance and preferences.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2026
Same author

Identification and Scaling of Latent Variables in Ordinal Factor Analysis.

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

Jack Fowle: Combining Values, Experience, and Teamwork to Improve Risk Analysis.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same journal

A Hybrid FMEA-AHP Framework for Risk Prioritization in Nontransparent Artificial Intelligence Systems.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same journal

Trust-Building Communication for Extreme Heat Preparedness.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same journal

Spring Broken: A Risk Analysis of Fatal and Nonfatal Traffic Injuries in Florida.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same journal

Global Sensitivity Analysis of Societal Resilience Using Shapley Values and Polynomial Chaos Expansion.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same journal

Assessing How Fact-Checks Influence Accuracy and Consensus Judgments: Evidence From the Olympics.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 6, 2026

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

Published on: June 3, 2009

14.9K

Evaluating probabilistic forecasts with Bayesian signal detection models.

Mark Steyvers1, Thomas S Wallsten, Edgar C Merkle

  • 1Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.

Risk Analysis : an Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis
|October 24, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces signal detection theory (SDT) to assess probabilistic forecasting systems and forecasters. The method distinguishes response from diagnosticity, even with limited data and subjective probabilities.

Keywords:
AUCBayesian methodsROC analysiscombining forecastsevaluating forecastsjudgmental forecastingprobability forecastingsignal detection theory

More Related Videos

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 6, 2026

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

Published on: June 3, 2009

14.9K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.1K

Area of Science:

  • Decision Science
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Forecasting Methodology

Background:

  • Evaluating probabilistic forecasting systems and individual forecaster performance is crucial.
  • Traditional methods struggle with subjective probabilities and sparse data in human forecasting.
  • Signal detection theory (SDT) offers a framework to separate response bias from system accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To adapt and apply signal detection theory (SDT) for evaluating probabilistic forecasts.
  • To address challenges of using judged probabilities and sparse data within SDT.
  • To provide a principled method for distinguishing forecaster response from system diagnosticity.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a model of individual forecast generation from underlying representations.
  • Employed Bayesian inference to estimate latent parameters of the forecasting process.
  • Utilized estimated representations to derive SDT metrics like Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves and Area Under the Curve (AUC).

Main Results:

  • Successfully applied SDT principles to probabilistic forecasts, overcoming limitations of binary decisions.
  • Enabled the estimation of ROC curves and AUC for individual forecasters over time.
  • Demonstrated the extension of the method to compare forecastability across different domains.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed SDT-based approach provides a robust method for evaluating probabilistic forecasts.
  • The method's reliance on ordinal properties of forecasts enhances its applicability.
  • This framework can potentially improve decision-making processes informed by forecasts.