Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Overview Of Cell Separation And Isolation

Overview Of Cell Separation And Isolation

Cell separation was first achieved in 1964 by S. H. Seal, who separated large tumor cells from the smaller blood cells using filtration. Two years later, Pohl and Hawk performed experiments on how cells respond differently to a nonuniform electric field based on the cell type. Such observations were the inception of cell separation methods, which allow isolating a single cell type from a heterogeneous sample.

Flow Cytometry

Flow Cytometry

The development of flow cytometry techniques began in 1934 with initial attempts by Andrew Moldavan, a bacteriologist who counted the cells in a flowing capillary system. Moldavan pumped cells through a capillary tube focused under a microscope for visualization. The invention of photometry allowed the measurement of differentially-stained cells, and Louis Kamentsky developed the first multiparameter flow cytometer in 1965 to identify and count the cancer cells in cervical tissue specimens.
In...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Human vaccine responses regulated by parallel cytokine pathways.

Nature immunology·2026

Same author

Immune Aging is an Independent Risk Factor for Cardiovascular Disease.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

Aging restricts maturation of CXCL13<sup>+</sup> T follicular helper cells in human immunity.

Cell reports·2026

Same author

Aging restricts maturation of CXCL13<sup>+</sup> T follicular helper cells in human immunity.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

A human-mouse atlas of intrarenal myeloid cells identifies conserved disease-associated macrophages in lupus nephritis.

The Journal of experimental medicine·2025

Same author

Cell-specific priors rescue differential gene expression in spatial spot-based technologies.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2024

Same journal

A blind spot of human T cell immunology: epitope specificity in secondary lymphoid organs.

Current opinion in immunology·2026

Same journal

Germinal center responses at barrier organ sites.

Current opinion in immunology·2026

Same journal

Ocular sarcoidosis: from clinical signs to targeted interventions.

Current opinion in immunology·2026

Same journal

On or within: spatial determinants of antigen handling in the nasal turbinates.

Current opinion in immunology·2026

Same journal

Decoding the complexity of intestinal immunity with spatial transcriptomics.

Current opinion in immunology·2026

Same journal

Reconsidering the immunological aspects of solid-phase assays for antiphospholipid antibodies detection.

Current opinion in immunology·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 6, 2026

Discrimination and Characterization of Heterocellular Populations Using Quantitative Imaging Techniques

Discrimination and Characterization of Heterocellular Populations Using Quantitative Imaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2017

Computational deconvolution: extracting cell type-specific information from heterogeneous samples.

Shai S Shen-Orr¹, Renaud Gaujoux

¹Rappaport Institute of Medical Research, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 31096, Israel; Department of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 31096, Israel; Faculty of Biology, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 31096, Israel.

Current Opinion in Immunology

|October 24, 2013

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Computational deconvolution methods analyze immune cell subsets within complex samples. This approach overcomes challenges in heterogeneous sample analysis, revealing hidden biological insights in immunology.

More Related Videos

A Combinatorial Single-cell Approach to Characterize the Molecular and Immunophenotypic Heterogeneity of Human Stem and Progenitor Populations

A Combinatorial Single-cell Approach to Characterize the Molecular and Immunophenotypic Heterogeneity of Human Stem and Progenitor Populations

Published on: October 25, 2018

Area-based Image Analysis Algorithm for Quantification of Macrophage-fibroblast Cocultures

Area-based Image Analysis Algorithm for Quantification of Macrophage-fibroblast Cocultures

Published on: February 15, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 6, 2026

Discrimination and Characterization of Heterocellular Populations Using Quantitative Imaging Techniques

Discrimination and Characterization of Heterocellular Populations Using Quantitative Imaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2017

A Combinatorial Single-cell Approach to Characterize the Molecular and Immunophenotypic Heterogeneity of Human Stem and Progenitor Populations

A Combinatorial Single-cell Approach to Characterize the Molecular and Immunophenotypic Heterogeneity of Human Stem and Progenitor Populations

Published on: October 25, 2018

Area-based Image Analysis Algorithm for Quantification of Macrophage-fibroblast Cocultures

Area-based Image Analysis Algorithm for Quantification of Macrophage-fibroblast Cocultures

Published on: February 15, 2022

Area of Science:

Immunology
Computational Biology
Genomics

Background:

Immune cell analysis is crucial, but samples are often heterogeneous.
Analyzing mixed cell populations can lead to misleading interpretations.
Current methods force a choice between analyzing mixed samples or focusing on limited cell types.

Purpose of the Study:

To review computational deconvolution techniques for analyzing heterogeneous immune cell samples.
To highlight the advantages and limitations of these methods.
To focus on applications in blood expression data and general immunology.

Main Methods:

Review of existing computational deconvolution algorithms.
Analysis of their applicability to heterogeneous biological samples, particularly blood.
Evaluation of techniques for extracting cell subset-specific information.

Main Results:

Deconvolution enables extraction of cell subset-specific data from mixed samples.
These computational methods offer a way to capture both cell-level and system-level biological context.
Novel biological discoveries are possible that are otherwise undetectable.

Conclusions:

Computational deconvolution is a powerful alternative to traditional methods for analyzing heterogeneous immune samples.
These techniques are essential for advancing immunological studies and blood expression data analysis.
Further development and application of deconvolution methods can unlock new biological understanding.