Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

Simulator Training for Endovascular Neurosurgery
Published on: May 6, 2020
Comparison of procedural complications with versus without interventional cardiology fellows-in-training during
Joshua M Stolker1, Drew S Allen2, David J Cohen3
1Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri.
Insights
Interventional cardiology fellows-in-training (ICFITs) performing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) did not increase complication rates. Patient outcomes were similar, with shorter hospital stays observed when ICFITs were present.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Education
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures are increasingly complex.
- The impact of interventional cardiology fellows-in-training (ICFITs) on PCI complication rates remains underreported.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the relationship between the presence of ICFITs and in-hospital complications during PCI.
- To compare patient and procedural characteristics for PCIs performed with and without ICFIT involvement.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 2,605 PCI procedures performed between July 2007 and April 2010 at an academic hospital.
- Logbooks from 6 ICFITs were compiled to identify procedures with and without fellow involvement.
- Complications were defined by the American College of Cardiology's National Cardiovascular Data Registry and analyzed using logistic regression.
Main Results:
- An ICFIT was present in 63% of PCI procedures.
- Patients in the ICFIT group had similar composite complication rates (12.9% vs. 14.5%, p=0.27) despite worse baseline characteristics.
- Longer fluoroscopy times and more stents were used in the ICFIT group, but hospital length of stay was shorter with no increased adverse events.
Conclusions:
- The presence of an ICFIT during PCI was not associated with an increased risk of in-hospital complications.
- Multivariable analysis confirmed no adverse impact of ICFIT involvement on PCI outcomes.
- Findings suggest that ICFITs can participate in complex PCI procedures without compromising patient safety.
Abstract:
Despite increasing complexity of contemporary procedures at tertiary care hospitals, the relationship between interventional cardiology fellows-in-training (ICFITs) and complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not been reported. We compiled logbooks of 6 ICFITs at an academic hospital and evaluated patient and procedural characteristics of PCIs performed with and without presence of an ICFIT. The primary end point was the composite of all in-hospital PCI complications defined by the American College of Cardiology's National Cardiovascular Data Registry: (1) catheterization laboratory events such as no-reflow and dissection/perforation, (2) general clinical events such as stroke or cardiogenic shock, (3) vascular and bleeding complications, and (4) miscellaneous complications such as peak troponin or creatinine levels. Logistic regression adjusted for differences in measured confounders between patients treated with and without presence of an ICFIT. All analyses were repeated after excluding PCI for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Of 2,605 PCI procedures at the academic hospital between July 2007 and April 2010, an ICFIT was present for 1,638 procedures (63%). Despite having worse clinical and procedural characteristics, patients in the ICFIT group experienced similar rates of the composite end point (12.9% vs 14.5% without ICFIT, p = 0.27). Longer mean fluoroscopy times and greater number of stents were noted in the ICFIT group; however, hospital length of stay was shorter and no individual adverse events were increased in the ICFIT procedures. Presence of an ICFIT remained unrelated to the composite end point after multivariable adjustment (odds ratio 0.92, 95% confidence interval 0.71 to 1.20; p = 0.53), and findings were similar after excluding PCI for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. In conclusion, in contemporary practice at a large academic medical center, PCI complication rates were not adversely affected by the presence of an ICFIT.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management

