Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Psychosurgery

Psychosurgery

Psychosurgery, the surgical alteration or permanent removal of brain tissue to alleviate severe psychological conditions, stands as one of the most radical and controversial treatments in the history of mental health care. Its development and application have evolved significantly, marked by dramatic shifts in scientific understanding and ethical perspectives.
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...

Healing II: Complications

Healing II: Complications

Complications during healing arise when tissue repair is altered by local or systemic factors. These changes involve abnormal collagen deposition, altered biomechanics, and reduced vascular supply, impairing restoration of normal structure and function.Loss of FunctionScar tissue differs significantly from the original tissue it replaces. In the skin, fibrosis lacks adnexal structures such as hair follicles, sebaceous glands, and sweat glands. Their absence reduces tactile sensitivity, impairs...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Facial disfigurement: problems and management of social interaction and implications for mental health.

Aesthetic plastic surgery·1990

Same author

Social, psychological and cultural dimensions of cosmetic and reconstructive plastic surgery.

Aesthetic plastic surgery·1989

Same author

Cosmetic surgery: a sociological analysis of litigation and a surgical specialty.

Aesthetic plastic surgery·1984

Same author

Social and psychological studies of plastic surgery. past, present, and future.

Clinics in plastic surgery·1982

Same author

Surgery: the patient and the surgeon.

Clinics in plastic surgery·1982

Same author

The place of the patient in society.

Aesthetic plastic surgery·1981

Same journal

Early Protein Supplementation Enhances Wound Healing and Reduces Complications Following Abdominoplasty: A Controlled Study in Non-bariatric Patients.

Aesthetic plastic surgery·2026

Same journal

Otoplasty in the Scientific Literature: Global Productivity, Thematic Evolution, and Forecasted Trajectories.

Aesthetic plastic surgery·2026

Same journal

Mycobacterium Abscessus Infection after Breast Augmentation: Case Reports and Literature Review.

Aesthetic plastic surgery·2026

Same journal

COVID-19-Related Immune Activation and Capsular Contracture: A Cohort Study of Infection, Vaccination, and Explantation.

Aesthetic plastic surgery·2026

Same journal

Do Native Breasts Move During Pectoralis Major Contraction in Unoperated Women? A Quantitative 3D Analysis.

Aesthetic plastic surgery·2026

Same journal

From Bench to Operating Room: The Scientific Mind in Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery.

Aesthetic plastic surgery·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 6, 2026

Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction

Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction

Published on: May 17, 2024

Aesthetic plastic surgery: Some caveats.

F C Macgregor¹

¹, 120 East 90 Street, 10028, New York, N.Y..

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

|November 1, 2013

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Careful patient selection is crucial in aesthetic plastic surgery to ensure satisfaction and avoid psychological risks. Thorough screening identifies individuals with unrealistic expectations or underlying psychological issues, preventing negative outcomes for patients and surgeons.

More Related Videos

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial

Published on: August 19, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 6, 2026

Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction

Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction

Published on: May 17, 2024

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial

Published on: August 19, 2025

Area of Science:

Psychology
Plastic Surgery

Background:

Increasing demand for aesthetic plastic surgery necessitates careful patient selection.
Potential psychological hazards exist for patients undergoing cosmetic procedures.
Subjectivity in patient complaints and expectations poses challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

To highlight the importance of expert evaluation in aesthetic plastic surgery patient selection.
To identify psychological risks associated with patient selection in cosmetic surgery.
To emphasize the need for skillful screening of candidates with vague expectations.

Main Methods:

Clinical interviews with aesthetic plastic surgery candidates.
Assessment of patient expectations and psychological disposition.
Evaluation of defect severity and patient's self-perception.

Main Results:

Patients with minimal defects often have subjective evaluations of cosmetic results.
Some candidates present correctable imperfections but lack clear goals or self-awareness.
Unrealistic expectations and psychological factors can lead to management problems post-surgery.

Conclusions:

Skillful screening is essential to identify patients at risk for dissatisfaction.
Thorough patient interviews are critical for managing expectations in aesthetic surgery.
Proper patient selection protects both the patient and the surgeon from adverse outcomes.