Reducing children's exposure to secondhand smoke at home: a randomized trial
Arusyak Harutyunyan1, Narine Movsisyan, Varduhi Petrosyan
1Baghramyan 40, Yerevan, Armenia. aharutyunyan@aua.am.
Pediatrics
|November 6, 2013
Summary
An intensive intervention effectively reduced children's secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure by educating mothers and increasing home smoking restrictions. While not statistically superior to minimal intervention, it showed significant decreases in hair nicotine levels.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Environmental Health
- Pediatrics
Background:
- Secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure poses significant health risks to children.
- Home environment is a primary source of SHS exposure for young children.
- Effective interventions are needed to protect children from SHS in residential settings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and evaluate an intensive intervention aimed at reducing children's SHS exposure in homes.
- To compare the effectiveness of an intensive intervention versus a minimal intervention in a randomized trial.
- To assess changes in children's SHS exposure biomarkers and parental knowledge.
Main Methods:
- A single-blind, randomized trial involving 250 households with children aged 2-6 years in Yerevan, Armenia.
- Intervention group received counseling, educational brochures, home air pollution demonstration, and follow-up calls.
- Control group received standard leaflets; biomonitoring (hair nicotine) and surveys were conducted at baseline and 4-month follow-up.
Main Results:
- The intensive intervention significantly decreased children's hair nicotine levels (0.30 to 0.23 ng/mg, P=.024).
- While hair nicotine was 17% lower in the intervention group, this difference was not statistically significant (P=.239).
- Mothers' knowledge scores significantly increased in the intervention group (P=.006), and smoking restrictions rose in both groups.
Conclusions:
- Intensive intervention effectively educates mothers and promotes home smoking restrictions, leading to decreased children's SHS exposure.
- The intervention demonstrated a positive impact on reducing exposure biomarkers and increasing parental knowledge.
- While promising, the study did not achieve statistically significant superiority over minimal intervention in reducing children's SHS exposure.


