Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

12:12
Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
Published on: May 14, 2014
10.3K
Negative priming from ignored distractors in visual selection: A review
1Department of Psychology, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, CO4 3SQ, Colchester, UK, efox@essex.ac.uk.
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|November 9, 2013
Summary
Negative priming (NP) occurs when ignoring a distractor impairs later responses to that object. This review explores selective inhibition, feature mismatching, and episodic retrieval as explanations for NP effects.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Neuroscience
- Perception
Background:
- Negative priming (NP) is a phenomenon where ignoring a distractor object on a prime trial impairs performance on that same object during a subsequent probe trial.
- The established explanation for NP is selective inhibition, suggesting active suppression of distractors during target selection.
- However, alternative hypotheses propose feature mismatching or episodic retrieval of prime trial information as potential causes of NP.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the existing literature on negative priming (NP).
- To evaluate the evidence supporting three main hypotheses of NP: selective inhibition, feature mismatching, and episodic retrieval.
- To highlight the need for critical experiments to differentiate between these competing explanations.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of studies investigating negative priming (NP).
- Analysis of empirical evidence related to selective inhibition, feature mismatching, and episodic retrieval hypotheses.
- Critical examination of experimental designs and findings within the NP research domain.
Main Results:
- Feature mismatching can account for NP in specific circumstances but is not a universal explanation.
- In many cases, NP is likely caused by either selective inhibition or episodic retrieval of previously ignored distractors.
- Empirical data to definitively distinguish between selective inhibition and episodic retrieval remains inconclusive.
Conclusions:
- While feature mismatching plays a role, it does not fully explain the negative priming (NP) effect.
- The underlying mechanism of NP likely involves either selective inhibition or episodic retrieval.
- Further research with targeted experimental designs is essential to resolve the theoretical debate surrounding NP mechanisms.

