Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect01:26

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

394
The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...
394

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex affects stimulus conflict but not response conflict.

Neuroscience·2016
Same author

An associative account of how the obesogenic environment biases adolescents' food choices.

Appetite·2015
Same author

Practice explains abolished behavioural adaptation after human dorsal anterior cingulate cortex lesions.

Scientific reports·2015
Same author

No role of beta receptors in cognitive flexibility: Evidence from a task-switching paradigm in a randomized controlled trial.

Neuroscience·2015
Same author

The developing cognitive substrate of sequential action control in 9- to 12-month-olds: evidence for concurrent activation models.

Cognition·2015
Same author

Working for food you don't desire. Cues interfere with goal-directed food-seeking.

Appetite·2014
Same journal

Mind wandering during first- and foreign-language reading.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Lexical word processing is unaffected by rapid invisible frequency tagging in reading: Evidence from eye movements.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Anxiety modulates voluntary attentional orienting to emotional gaze cues: Eye movements for pro- and anti-saccades.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Faster key-press responses to front vowels than back vowels when matching heard vowels with represented vowels.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Testing the interleaving effect without response bias: A forced-choice reevaluation of Kornell and Bjork (2008).

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

The impact of social interaction on abstract concepts.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 6, 2026

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
09:52

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

10.8K

S-R compatibility effects due to context-dependent spatial stimulus coding.

B Hommel1, Y Lippa

  • 1Max Planck Institute for Psychological Research, Leopoldstr. 24, D-80802, München, Germany, hommel@mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de.

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|November 9, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Spatial compatibility effects, where responses are faster with spatial stimulus-response correspondence, occur even when stimulus location is irrelevant. This suggests automatic object-based spatial coding influences response selection speed.

More Related Videos

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

16.6K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 6, 2026

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
09:52

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

10.8K
Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

16.6K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.1K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Factors
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Spatial stimulus-response (S-R) correspondence enhances response speed (spatial compatibility effect).
  • The Simon effect demonstrates faster responses when stimulus and response locations correspond, even if irrelevant.
  • The role of visual context in spatial coding and its influence on response selection remains an area of investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if visual context can induce left-right coding for stimuli presented above and below a fixation point.
  • To determine if this induced coding affects response selection, similar to the Simon effect.
  • To examine the automaticity of object-based spatial coding.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted using a visual display with stimuli presented on a face image.
  • Stimuli appeared on the left or right eye of a face tilted by 90° (Experiment 1) or varying in tilt (Experiment 2).
  • Response times were measured under conditions of relevant and irrelevant stimulus location information.

Main Results:

  • Responses were significantly faster when the face-based stimulus location corresponded with the egocentric response location.
  • This effect persisted regardless of whether stimulus location was relevant or irrelevant to the task.
  • Faster responses were observed even when stimulus and response locations varied on physically orthogonal dimensions.

Conclusions:

  • Object-based spatial stimulus codes are formed automatically, influencing response selection speed.
  • Visual context can automatically induce spatial coding, impacting performance on S-R tasks.
  • These findings contribute to understanding the automatic mechanisms underlying spatial attention and response selection.