Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect01:26

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

394
The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...
394
Factors Influencing Attraction III: Similarity01:23

Factors Influencing Attraction III: Similarity

974
The similarity hypothesis suggests that individuals are more likely to form relationships with others who share similar attitudes, beliefs, values, and interests. This concept has been widely studied in social psychology, demonstrating that perceived similarity fosters interpersonal attraction. In an experiment supporting this hypothesis, participants were presented with fabricated information indicating that strangers held attitudes similar to their own. The results showed that participants...
974
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

6.8K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
6.8K
Self-Discrepancy Theory02:45

Self-Discrepancy Theory

17.9K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.  
17.9K
Structural Classification of Joints01:20

Structural Classification of Joints

8.0K
Joints, also known as articulations, are classified based on their structural characteristics, i.e., based on whether the articulating surfaces of the adjacent bones are directly connected by fibrous connective tissue or cartilage, or whether the articulating surfaces contact each other within a fluid-filled joint cavity. These differences serve to divide the joints of the body into three structural classifications.
A fibrous joint is where the adjacent bones are united by fibrous connective...
8.0K
Stereoisomerism02:52

Stereoisomerism

11.1K
Isomerism in Complexes
Isomers are different chemical species that have the same chemical formula.
Transition metal complexes often exist as geometric isomers, in which the same atoms are connected through the same types of bonds but with differences in their orientation in space. Coordination complexes with two different ligands in the cis and trans positions from a ligand of interest form isomers. For example, the octahedral [Co(NH3)4Cl2]+ ion has two isomers (Figure 1) In the cis...
11.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparison and choice: Relations between similarity processes and decision processes.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

How do indirect measures of evaluation work? Evaluating the inference of prejudice in the Implicit Association Test.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2001
Same author

Thinking.

Annual review of psychology·2001
Same author

Structure mapping in the comparison process.

The American journal of psychology·2000
Same author

Inference using categories.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2000
Same author

In defense of representation.

Cognitive psychology·2000
Same journal

Anxiety modulates voluntary attentional orienting to emotional gaze cues: Eye movements for pro- and anti-saccades.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Faster key-press responses to front vowels than back vowels when matching heard vowels with represented vowels.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Testing the interleaving effect without response bias: A forced-choice reevaluation of Kornell and Bjork (2008).

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

The impact of social interaction on abstract concepts.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

The role of eye movements and covert shifts of attention in working and long-term memory retrieval.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

The effect of source expertise on the persuasiveness and sharing of health information on social media: A systematic review.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 6, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.1K

Structural alignment in similarity and difference judgments.

A B Markman1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Columbia University, 406 Schermerhorn Hall, 10027, New York, NY, markman@psych.columbia.edu.

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|November 12, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Cognitive judgments of similarity and difference are not always opposites. This study shows both similarity and difference rely on structural alignment processes for cognitive comparison.

More Related Videos

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments
05:39

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments

Published on: March 18, 2019

4.7K
Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

19.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 6, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.1K
Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments
05:39

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments

Published on: March 18, 2019

4.7K
Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

19.5K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychological Science

Background:

  • Similarity is a key concept in cognitive processing and has been extensively studied.
  • Research indicates that judgments of similarity and difference are not always inverse.
  • Existing theories propose different mechanisms, such as attribute matching versus relational matching, or differential use of structural alignment outputs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the underlying mechanisms of similarity and difference judgments.
  • To determine whether attribute or relational similarity drives these judgments.
  • To test the hypothesis that both similarity and difference judgments involve structural alignment.

Main Methods:

  • The study employed the one-shot mapping technique.
  • This method creates a competition between attribute similarity and relational similarity.
  • Participants' judgments were analyzed to infer the cognitive processes involved.

Main Results:

  • The results indicate that both attribute similarity and relational similarity play a role.
  • Evidence supports the idea that similarity and difference judgments share common underlying processes.
  • The findings suggest that structural alignment is a fundamental component of both types of judgments.

Conclusions:

  • Similarity and difference judgments are not simple inverses of each other.
  • Both types of judgments appear to rely on a shared process of structural alignment.
  • This finding advances our understanding of how humans compare information and make judgments.