Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Generation of a pictorial code.

Memory & cognition·2013
Same author

Semantic distance effects in naming superordinates.

Memory & cognition·2013
Same author

Foundation-level dyslexia: assessment and treatment.

Journal of learning disabilities·2004
Same author

A small-to-large unit progression in metaphonological awareness and reading?

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2000
Same author

Socio-economic differences in foundation-level literacy.

British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)·2000
Same author

How important are rhyme and analogy in beginning reading?

Cognition·1997

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 6, 2026

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task
05:31

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task

Published on: February 26, 2020

14.5K

Stroop interference with response, comparison, and encoding stages in a sentence-picture comparison task.

P H Seymour1

  • 1The University, Dundee, Scotland.

Memory & Cognition
|November 12, 2013
PubMed
Summary

This study explored a Stroop variant of the word-picture comparison task. Findings show that semantic interference, not just word meaning, significantly impacts response times in such cognitive tasks.

More Related Videos

Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color
10:27

Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color

Published on: February 20, 2014

23.8K
A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

12.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 6, 2026

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task
05:31

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task

Published on: February 26, 2020

14.5K
Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color
10:27

Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color

Published on: February 20, 2014

23.8K
A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

12.7K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Experimental Psychology
  • Linguistics

Background:

  • The word-picture comparison task is a standard method for studying semantic processing.
  • The Stroop task is a well-established paradigm for investigating cognitive interference.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the Stroop effect within a word-picture comparison task.
  • To examine how semantic interference influences response latency and accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed a word-picture comparison task using locatives (e.g., 'above', 'below').
  • Control conditions used an array of Xs, while experimental conditions used incongruent words (e.g., 'yes', 'no').
  • Response times and accuracy were recorded under different conditions.

Main Results:

  • In control conditions, 'above' displays were faster than 'below', and true statements faster than false.
  • Replacing Xs with words ('yes', 'no') caused a small, general increase in response latency.
  • Printing locative words ('up', 'down') induced a significant Stroop effect, eliminating prior above-below and true-false effects.

Conclusions:

  • Semantic interference, particularly from incongruent locative words, significantly disrupts cognitive processing in word-picture comparison tasks.
  • The findings provide insights into the mechanisms underlying Stroop interference and sentence-picture comparison processes.