Search research articles

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Generation of a pictorial code.

Memory & cognition·2013

Same author

Semantic distance effects in naming superordinates.

Memory & cognition·2013

Same author

Foundation-level dyslexia: assessment and treatment.

Journal of learning disabilities·2004

Same author

A small-to-large unit progression in metaphonological awareness and reading?

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2000

Same author

Socio-economic differences in foundation-level literacy.

British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)·2000

Same author

How important are rhyme and analogy in beginning reading?

Cognition·1997

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 6, 2026

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task

Published on: February 26, 2020

Stroop interference with response, comparison, and encoding stages in a sentence-picture comparison task.

¹The University, Dundee, Scotland.

Memory & Cognition

|November 12, 2013

Summary

This study explored a Stroop variant of the word-picture comparison task. Findings show that semantic interference, not just word meaning, significantly impacts response times in such cognitive tasks.

More Related Videos

Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color

Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color

Published on: February 20, 2014

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 6, 2026

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task

Published on: February 26, 2020

Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color

Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color

Published on: February 20, 2014

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Experimental Psychology
Linguistics

Background:

The word-picture comparison task is a standard method for studying semantic processing.
The Stroop task is a well-established paradigm for investigating cognitive interference.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the Stroop effect within a word-picture comparison task.
To examine how semantic interference influences response latency and accuracy.

Main Methods:

Participants performed a word-picture comparison task using locatives (e.g., 'above', 'below').
Control conditions used an array of Xs, while experimental conditions used incongruent words (e.g., 'yes', 'no').
Response times and accuracy were recorded under different conditions.

Main Results:

In control conditions, 'above' displays were faster than 'below', and true statements faster than false.
Replacing Xs with words ('yes', 'no') caused a small, general increase in response latency.
Printing locative words ('up', 'down') induced a significant Stroop effect, eliminating prior above-below and true-false effects.

Conclusions:

Semantic interference, particularly from incongruent locative words, significantly disrupts cognitive processing in word-picture comparison tasks.
The findings provide insights into the mechanisms underlying Stroop interference and sentence-picture comparison processes.