Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

94.0K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
94.0K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

11.2K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
11.2K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

974
974
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

14.7K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
14.7K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

8.3K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
8.3K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

360
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
360

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Minimum mortality temperature by cause of death and age group: A multi-country observational study (1990-2019).

Environmental research·2026
Same author

Temporal changes in mortality risk associated with PM<sub>10</sub> across 143 cities in 26 countries: a multicountry, multicity time-series study.

The Lancet. Planetary health·2026
Same author

The burden of premature births attributed to heat across 13 countries.

Environment international·2026
Same author

Impact of local and national policies to reduce agriculture-related air pollution through improving diet and farm management: the AMPHoRA mixed methods study.

Public health research (Southampton, England)·2026
Same author

ADHD (over) diagnosis: fiction, fashion and failure.

The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science·2026
Same author

Variation in reporting of heatstroke mortality: evidence from a multi-country study.

The Lancet. Public health·2026
Same journal

Integrating health economics and implementation science: a call to action.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same journal

Methods for incorporating test result information within the high-dimensional propensity score framework: application in UK electronic health record data.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same journal

Sparse multi-way DMDC for longitudinal classification in high dimension low sample size data.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same journal

Tree-based exploratory identification of predictive biomarkers in non-randomized data.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same journal

Comparative evaluation of interrupted time series analytical methods for healthcare quality improvement research: a Monte Carlo simulation study.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same journal

Methodological advances in claims-based dementia algorithms: integrating medication and clinical data for medicare populations.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 6, 2026

Author Spotlight: Alignment of Synchronized Time-Series Data Using the Characterizing Loss of Cell Cycle Synchrony Model for Cross-Experiment Comparisons
07:59

Author Spotlight: Alignment of Synchronized Time-Series Data Using the Characterizing Loss of Cell Cycle Synchrony Model for Cross-Experiment Comparisons

Published on: June 9, 2023

2.0K

Measurement error in time-series analysis: a simulation study comparing modelled and monitored data.

Barbara K Butland, Ben Armstrong1, Richard W Atkinson

  • 1Department of Social and Environmental Health Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK. ben.armstrong@lshtm.ac.uk.

BMC Medical Research Methodology
|November 14, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Statistical simulations revealed that even with strong correlations, measurement errors in air pollution models can bias health effect estimates. Using sparse monitor data can lead to significant attenuation in epidemiological time-series analyses.

More Related Videos

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
10:46

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data

Published on: December 9, 2015

10.3K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

2.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 6, 2026

Author Spotlight: Alignment of Synchronized Time-Series Data Using the Characterizing Loss of Cell Cycle Synchrony Model for Cross-Experiment Comparisons
07:59

Author Spotlight: Alignment of Synchronized Time-Series Data Using the Characterizing Loss of Cell Cycle Synchrony Model for Cross-Experiment Comparisons

Published on: June 9, 2023

2.0K
A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
10:46

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data

Published on: December 9, 2015

10.3K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

2.9K

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Epidemiology
  • Atmospheric Chemistry

Background:

  • Assessing air pollution health effects is challenged by sparse monitoring networks.
  • Regional atmospheric chemistry-transport models (CTMs) offer national coverage and fine resolution data.
  • Statistical simulations compared measurement error impacts from sparse monitor data versus complete model data in health studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the impact of measurement error from sparse monitor data versus complete model data in epidemiological time-series analysis.
  • To evaluate how the number of monitors per region affects health effect estimates.
  • To assess the bias introduced by additive classical measurement error in model data.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized statistical simulations on a theoretical area with 4 regions, each containing 25 grid-squares.
  • Conducted a 3-year Poisson regression time-series analysis comparing daily grid-specific model data with daily regional average monitor data.
  • Informed simulations with UK national network monitor data and EMEP-WRF CTM model data (2003-2006).

Main Results:

  • Health effect estimates showed little bias with 5-10 monitors per region.
  • With only 1 monitor per region, regression coefficients were attenuated by 6-38% for ozone and NO2.
  • Grid-specific model data resulted in 19-54% attenuation, particularly marked for urban NO2.

Conclusions:

  • Additive classical measurement error in air pollution model data can cause significant bias in health effect estimates, even with strong model-monitor correlations.
  • Statistical simulation is a valuable tool for assessing error impacts as process-based models are increasingly used in epidemiology.
  • Careful consideration of data sources and potential errors is crucial for reliable epidemiological findings.