Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

08:53
Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke
Published on: June 6, 2025
2.1K
Effects of writing down the request for help: a randomized controlled trial.
Birgit S Brinkman1, Kornelis J J van Hateren, Nanne Kleefstra
1Diabetes Centre , Isala, Zwolle , the Netherlands.
The European Journal of General Practice
|November 14, 2013
Summary
Using a request card to document patient concerns before a doctor visit did not improve patient satisfaction. This study found no significant difference in satisfaction levels between patients who used the card and those who did not.
Area of Science:
- General Practice
- Patient-Doctor Communication
- Healthcare Improvement
Background:
- Interventions to enhance patient satisfaction by addressing patient requests for help have yielded inconsistent findings.
- Improving patient satisfaction is a key goal in primary care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if writing down requests for help on a card before a medical consultation enhances patient satisfaction.
- Investigating the impact of a structured communication tool on the patient-physician interaction.
Main Methods:
- A single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted in Dutch general practices.
- Patients were randomized to either use a request card or not; patients were blinded to the intervention.
- Patient satisfaction was measured using the Consultation Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Main Results:
- No statistically significant difference in patient satisfaction was observed between the request card group and the control group.
- Analysis of secondary outcomes, including various CSQ subscales and VAS scores, also revealed no significant differences.
- Consultation time and follow-up consultation rates were not significantly affected by the intervention.
Conclusions:
- The use of a patient request card did not demonstrate a beneficial effect on patient satisfaction with the medical consultation.
- Further research may be needed to explore alternative methods for improving patient-physician communication and satisfaction.
- The findings suggest that this specific intervention may not be an effective strategy for enhancing patient satisfaction in primary care settings.
Related Concept Videos
Persuasion Strategies
29.8K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
29.8K
The Scientific Method
57.2K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
57.2K
Blinding
2.9K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
2.9K
Bystander Effect
9.6K
The discussion of bullying highlights the problem of witnesses not intervening to help a victim. This is a common occurrence, as the following well-publicized event demonstrates. In 1964, in Queens, New York, a 19-year-old woman named Kitty Genovese was attacked by a person with a knife near the back entrance to her apartment building and again in the hallway inside her apartment building. When the attack occurred, she screamed for help numerous times and eventually died from her stab wounds.
9.6K
Blind Procedures
10.8K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
10.8K
Group Design
9.3K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
9.3K

