Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Factors Influencing Attraction III: Similarity01:23

Factors Influencing Attraction III: Similarity

974
The similarity hypothesis suggests that individuals are more likely to form relationships with others who share similar attitudes, beliefs, values, and interests. This concept has been widely studied in social psychology, demonstrating that perceived similarity fosters interpersonal attraction. In an experiment supporting this hypothesis, participants were presented with fabricated information indicating that strangers held attitudes similar to their own. The results showed that participants...
974
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

3.5K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
3.5K
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

13.1K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
13.1K
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect01:26

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

394
The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...
394
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test01:09

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

5.8K
The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...
5.8K
Robbers Cave04:49

Robbers Cave

13.6K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
13.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Stochastic heuristics for decisions under risk and uncertainty.

Frontiers in psychology·2024
Same author

Variance, skewness and multiple outcomes in described and experienced prospects: Can one descriptive model capture it all?

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2022
Same author

On the effectiveness of COVID-19 restrictions and lockdowns: Pan metron ariston.

BMC public health·2022
Same author

How Much Is a Human Life Worth? A Systematic Review.

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research·2021
Same author

Studies in Ecological Rationality.

Topics in cognitive science·2021
Same author

A map of ecologically rational heuristics for uncertain strategic worlds.

Psychological review·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 6, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.1K

Model comparisons using tournaments: likes, "dislikes," and challenges.

Leonidas Spiliopoulos1, Andreas Ortmann1

  • 1Australian School of Business, University of New South Wales.

Psychological Methods
|November 14, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Tournaments comparing behavioral model predictive power offer significant value. This study systematically discusses their advantages, disadvantages, and limitations, proposing solutions and a research agenda for future development.

More Related Videos

One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence
14:05

One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence

Published on: December 15, 2010

24.8K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 6, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.1K
One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence
14:05

One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence

Published on: December 15, 2010

24.8K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.8K

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral economics
  • Model comparison methodologies

Background:

  • The predictive power of behavioral models is crucial for understanding economic decision-making.
  • Systematic evaluation of methods for comparing these models is lacking in current literature.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the value added of using tournaments to compare the predictive power of behavioral models.
  • To systematically discuss the advantages and disadvantages of behavioral model tournaments.
  • To identify limitations and propose future research directions.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of tournament methodologies for behavioral models.
  • Identification and illustration of current limitations in tournament design and execution.
  • Development of a research agenda for addressing identified limitations.

Main Results:

  • Tournaments represent a valuable addition to the methods for assessing behavioral model predictive power.
  • Significant advancements in the study of predictive accuracy are facilitated by these tournaments.
  • Current limitations of tournaments have been identified and addressed with proposed solutions.

Conclusions:

  • Behavioral model tournaments are a significant step forward in predictive modeling.
  • Addressing identified limitations will further enhance the utility of tournament methods.
  • A clear research agenda is established for the continued development of this comparative approach.