Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Phototoxic evaluation of marine sediments collected from a PAH-contaminated site.

Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology·2000

Same author

Isolated closed rupture of the bony insertion of the flexor digitorum superficialis tendon: an unusual case.

The Journal of hand surgery·1998

Same author

Photoinduced toxicity of fluoranthene to seven marine benthic crustaceans.

Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology·1997

Same author

Management of gunshot fractures of the tibia.

The Orthopedic clinics of North America·1995

Same author

Accumulation factors for eleven polychlorinated biphenyl congeners.

Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology·1991

Same author

Predicting bioaccumulation potential: a test of a fugacity-based model.

Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology·1990

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 6, 2026

Environmental Sampling of Photosynthetic Microbes and Their Viruses: From Field to Lab

Environmental Sampling of Photosynthetic Microbes and Their Viruses: From Field to Lab

Published on: July 3, 2025

Optimum macrobenthic sampling protocol for detecting pollution impacts in the Southern California Bight.

S P Ferraro¹, R C Swartz, F A Cole

¹Pacific Ecosystems Branch, ERL-N, Hatfield Marine Science Center, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2111 S.E. Marine Science Drive, 97365-5260, Newport, OR, USA.

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

|November 14, 2013

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Determining the optimal macrobenthic sampling protocol, including sample size and sieve mesh, is crucial for detecting pollution impacts. A cost-effective method using smaller samples reliably identifies ecological changes.

More Related Videos

Methods for Image-based Surveys of Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Their Habitat Exemplified by the Drop Camera Survey for the Atlantic Sea Scallop

Methods for Image-based Surveys of Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Their Habitat Exemplified by the Drop Camera Survey for the Atlantic Sea Scallop

Published on: July 2, 2018

Protocol for Microplastics Sampling on the Sea Surface and Sample Analysis

Protocol for Microplastics Sampling on the Sea Surface and Sample Analysis

Published on: December 16, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 6, 2026

Environmental Sampling of Photosynthetic Microbes and Their Viruses: From Field to Lab

Environmental Sampling of Photosynthetic Microbes and Their Viruses: From Field to Lab

Published on: July 3, 2025

Methods for Image-based Surveys of Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Their Habitat Exemplified by the Drop Camera Survey for the Atlantic Sea Scallop

Methods for Image-based Surveys of Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Their Habitat Exemplified by the Drop Camera Survey for the Atlantic Sea Scallop

Published on: July 2, 2018

Protocol for Microplastics Sampling on the Sea Surface and Sample Analysis

Protocol for Microplastics Sampling on the Sea Surface and Sample Analysis

Published on: December 16, 2016

Area of Science:

Marine ecology
Environmental science
Benthic ecology

Background:

Pollution impacts on marine ecosystems require effective monitoring.
Standard macrobenthic sampling protocols can be costly and time-consuming.
Optimizing sampling methods is essential for accurate ecological assessments.

Purpose of the Study:

To determine the optimal macrobenthic sampling protocol for detecting pollution impacts in the Southern California Bight.
To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of different sampling units, sieve mesh sizes, and sample sizes.
To establish a reliable and efficient method for assessing macrobenthic community structure.

Main Methods:

Evaluated fourteen sampling units (0.005-0.1 m^2) and two sieve mesh sizes (1.0 and 0.5 mm).
Conducted statistical power analyses to determine minimum sample size (n min) for reliable impact detection (α=0.05, 1-β≧0.95).
Calculated total cost (laboratory processing time) × n min to identify the most efficient protocol.

Main Results:

A protocol of five replicate, 0.02 m^2, 1.0 mm mesh samples per station reliably distinguished reference from impacted conditions on most community structure measures.
This optimized protocol achieved reliable detection at less than one-quarter the cost of the standard protocol (five replicate, 0.1 m^2, 1.0 mm mesh samples).
Smaller, replicate samples (approx. 5 per station) are often optimal for detecting changes in species-rich, abundant macrobenthic communities.

Conclusions:

The optimal macrobenthic sampling protocol involves using smaller sample sizes and 1.0 mm mesh sieves for cost-effective pollution impact detection.
This optimized approach enhances the reliability and efficiency of monitoring ecological changes in marine environments.
The findings provide a practical guideline for researchers and environmental managers conducting benthic surveys.