Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

Integration of Wet and Dry Bench Processes Optimizes Targeted Next-generation Sequencing of Low-quality and Low-quantity Tumor Biopsies
Published on: April 11, 2016
Translating genomics in cancer care
Yvonne Bombard1, Peter B Bach, Kenneth Offit
1From the aCenter for Health Policy and Outcomes, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and bClinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; and cSchool of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Genomic technologies show promise for personalized cancer medicine, but significant evidence gaps remain for clinical translation. Further research is crucial for responsible integration of next-generation sequencing (NGS) into cancer care.
Area of Science:
- Genomics and Personalized Medicine
- Oncology
- Health Technology Assessment
Background:
- Genomics is increasingly vital for personalized medicine, with oncology serving as a primary area for clinical translation.
- Genomic applications in oncology include hereditary cancer risk assessment (e.g., BRCA1/2) and somatic testing for treatment response (e.g., EGFR).
- Health technology assessment (HTA) is essential for evaluating new genomic technologies, considering clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and societal impact.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review evidentiary standards for translating cancer genomic technologies into clinical practice.
- To examine validity, utility, cost-effectiveness, health service impacts, and ethical/societal issues of genomic technologies.
- To identify research needs for the responsible integration of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in healthcare.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of the evidentiary base for key cancer genomic technologies.
- Assessment of genomic technologies across the continuum of validity, utility, cost-effectiveness, and health services.
- Consideration of ethical and societal implications, including challenges from direct-to-consumer services and incidental findings.
Main Results:
- Significant evidentiary gaps persist in translating genomic technologies into routine clinical practice, particularly concerning efficacy and health outcomes.
- Next-generation sequencing (NGS) translation faces challenges including limited accuracy, unproven efficacy, and computational/counseling complexities.
- Current translation efforts for NGS often proceed despite these limitations, highlighting a need for rigorous evaluation.
Conclusions:
- Substantial research is required to address efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and health services impacts for genomic technologies in cancer care.
- Responsible introduction of NGS into healthcare necessitates further research to ensure effective, efficient, and equitable application.
- Addressing evidentiary gaps is critical for the successful and ethical integration of genomics into routine cancer diagnostics and therapeutics.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Genomics
Pharmacogenomics: Identification of New Drug Targets
Cancer
Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes
Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
Cancer-Critical Genes I: Proto-oncogenes

