Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

08:25
Evaluating the Function of the Foot Core System in the Elderly
Published on: March 11, 2022
3.2K
A core-item reviewer evaluation (CoRE) system for manuscript peer review
Adedayo A Onitilo1, Jessica M Engel, Sherry A Salzman-Scott
1a Clinical Epidemiology Unit , School of Population Health, University of Queensland , Brisbane , Australia.
Accountability in Research
|November 16, 2013
Summary
Improving manuscript peer review accountability is crucial. A new system directing reviewers to specific choices, rather than global judgments, enhances inter-reviewer agreement for more consistent scientific publishing.
Area of Science:
- Bibliometrics
- Scholarly Communication
- Scientific Publishing
Background:
- Manuscript peer review is vital for publication integrity and accountability.
- Current peer review practices lack consensus, leading to inconsistent journal standards.
- Significant inter-reviewer disagreement is documented, questioning the reliability of current methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate a novel peer review system designed to improve accountability and consistency.
- To assess the impact of directing reviewers to specific, non-global judgment items with justification.
Main Methods:
- An international survey was conducted among healthcare professionals who recently reviewed manuscripts.
- Participants' experiences with a structured peer review system were evaluated.
Main Results:
- The proposed peer review system demonstrated improved inter-reviewer agreement.
- This structured approach supports more consistent and effective manuscript evaluation.
Conclusions:
- Implementing a peer review system that directs reviewers to concrete choices enhances reliability.
- This method has the potential to standardize and improve the quality of scientific peer review across journals.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
427
The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...
427
Review and Preview
5.9K
In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
5.9K
Review and Preview
9.5K
Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
9.5K
Quality Assurance
4.0K
Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...
4.0K
Quality Control
4.3K
Quality control is one of the three cyclical quality assurance activities that help keep a system under statistical control. Typical quality control activities include creating quality control charts, conducting proficiency testing, and documenting and archiving results.
Quality control helps track data, visualize trends, and identify variations, making it easier to detect deviations that may affect the accuracy of an analysis. One way to do this is by generating a quality control chart, which...
Quality control helps track data, visualize trends, and identify variations, making it easier to detect deviations that may affect the accuracy of an analysis. One way to do this is by generating a quality control chart, which...
4.3K
Nursing Evaluation
4.1K
The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
4.1K

