Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

In vitro Assessment of Aortic Regurgitation Using Four-Dimensional Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: February 25, 2022
Aortic relative pressure components derived from four-dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance
Pablo Lamata1, Alex Pitcher, Sebastian Krittian
1Department of Biomedical engineering, Division of Imaging Sciences, The Rayne Institute, Kings College School of Medicine, United Kingdom; Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
Researchers quantified relative aortic pressure components using 4D-flow CMR. Transient effects dominate in healthy individuals, while aortic disease patients exhibit altered pressure dynamics due to geometric abnormalities.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Imaging
- Biomedical Engineering
- Fluid Dynamics
Background:
- Relative aortic pressure is crucial for understanding cardiovascular health.
- Its spatiotemporal distribution and underlying components are not fully characterized.
- Advanced imaging techniques are needed to quantify these pressure dynamics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the spatiotemporal distribution of relative aortic pressure.
- To quantify the magnitude of its three major components: transient, convective, and viscous.
- To investigate pressure variations in healthy volunteers and patients with aortic disease.
Main Methods:
- Four-dimensional (4D) flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging was performed on nine healthy volunteers and three patients with aortic disease.
- Spatiotemporal pressure maps were computed by solving the pressure Poisson equation from CMR flow fields.
- Pressure components were separated into time-varying inertial (transient), spatially varying inertial (convective), and viscous contributions.
Main Results:
- In healthy subjects, relative aortic pressure was primarily driven by transient effects (64.5%), followed by convective (13.6%) and viscous (0.3%) components.
- Regional analysis indicated prevalent convective effects in the Sinus of Valsalva and aortic arch during peak velocity.
- Patients with aortic disease showed altered peak transient values, duration, and localized convective changes linked to geometric abnormalities and complex flow patterns.
Conclusions:
- Evaluating the three components of relative aortic pressure provides mechanistic insights into aortic disease.
- This quantitative approach aids in understanding and stratifying aortic disease severity.
- The findings have potential implications for guiding future therapeutic strategies in aortic conditions.
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Blood Flow

