Computational protein design quantifies structural constraints on amino acid covariation
Noah Ollikainen1, Tanja Kortemme
1Graduate Program in Bioinformatics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Plos Computational Biology
|November 19, 2013
Summary
Protein structure significantly constrains amino acid covariation, influencing protein evolution. Computational design methods that include backbone flexibility accurately capture these structural constraints, revealing key evolutionary pressures.
Area of Science:
- Structural Biology
- Computational Biology
- Protein Evolution
Background:
- Amino acid covariation, correlated amino acid identities at different sequence positions, is common in proteins.
- Covariation arises from structural, functional, and phylogenetic factors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify the role of protein structure in constraining amino acid covariation.
- To assess if computational protein design can replicate natural covariation patterns.
Main Methods:
- Flexible backbone computational protein design was used on 40 protein domains.
- Amino acid covariation in natural sequences was compared to computationally designed sequences.
Main Results:
- Significant similarities were found between natural and computationally designed amino acid covariation.
- Protein structure's constraints are a dominant factor shaping amino acid covariation.
- Backbone flexibility in computational design is crucial for accurate modeling of covariation.
Conclusions:
- Computational protein design effectively captures structure-imposed amino acid covariation.
- Protein architecture plays a primary role in driving correlated amino acid changes.
- Accurate modeling requires incorporating backbone flexibility to understand evolutionary pressures.
Related Concept Videos
Conservation of Protein Domains Over Different Proteins
11.8K
Protein domains are small structurally independent units that are part of a single amino acid chain. Although these domains are often structurally independent, they may rely on synergistic effects to perform their functions as part of a larger protein. Protein domains may be conserved within the same organism, as well as across different organisms.
A limited set of protein domains often duplicate and recombine during evolution. These domains can be organized in different combinations to...
A limited set of protein domains often duplicate and recombine during evolution. These domains can be organized in different combinations to...
11.8K
Protein Organization
7.2K
Proteins are polymers of amino acid residues. They are versatile and responsible for different cellular functions, including DNA replication, molecular transport, catalysis, and structural support. Proteins have a hierarchical structure comprising at least three levels of organization: primary, secondary, and tertiary structure. Some large proteins have a quaternary structure where individual protein subunits are linked together.
The primary structure of a protein is its amino acid sequence....
The primary structure of a protein is its amino acid sequence....
7.2K
Protein Organization
9.0K
9.0K
Protein Organization
123.4K
Overview
123.4K
Protein Organization
19.6K
19.6K
Conserved Binding Sites
4.1K
Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
4.1K


