Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
Published on: July 5, 2011
Improving the peer review process in orthopaedic journals
A P Sprowson1, K S Rankin, I McNamara
1Warwick Medical School, Clinical SciencesBuilding, Warwick University, CliffordBridge Road, Coventry CV2 2DX, UK.
Abstract:
The peer review process for the evaluation of manuscripts for publication needs to be better understood by the orthopaedic community. Improving the degree of transparency surrounding the review process and educating orthopaedic surgeons on how to improve their manuscripts for submission will help improve both the review procedure and resultant feedback, with an increase in the quality of the subsequent publications. This article seeks to clarify the peer review process and suggest simple ways in which the quality of submissions can be improved to maximise publication success. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2013;2:245-7.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Bone Remodeling
Bone Structure
Osteoclasts in Bone Remodeling

