Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Frictional Force01:07

Frictional Force

8.3K
When a body is in motion, it encounters resistance because the body interacts with its surroundings. This resistance is known as friction, a common yet complex force whose behavior is still not completely understood. Friction opposes relative motion between systems in contact, but also allows us to move. Friction arises in part due to the roughness of surfaces in contact. For one object to move along a surface, it must rise to where the peaks of the surface can skip along the bottom of the...
8.3K
Characteristics of Dry Friction01:21

Characteristics of Dry Friction

1.2K
Dry friction occurs when two solid surfaces slide against each other without any lubrication or fluid present. It causes resistance when pushing objects along a surface, like a gardener pushing a wheelbarrow. The force applied to move the cart causes dry friction between the wheel and the ground.
Before the wheelbarrow starts moving, the static frictional force acts tangentially to the contact surface, opposing the force that is about to induce the motion. This frictional force prevents the...
1.2K
Types of Friction Problems01:27

Types of Friction Problems

1.1K
Friction is an essential concept in physics, engineering, and everyday life. It is the force that opposes the relative motion or tendency of such motion between two surfaces in contact. One of the most common types of friction encountered in various applications is dry friction. Dry friction problems can be broadly categorized into three types, each with unique characteristics and challenges.
The first type of dry friction problem involves situations where there is no apparent impending motion....
1.1K
Static and Kinetic Frictional Force01:05

Static and Kinetic Frictional Force

20.5K
One of the simpler characteristics of sliding friction is that it is parallel to the contact surfaces between systems, and is always in a direction that opposes the motion or attempted motion of the systems relative to each other. If two systems are in contact and moving relative to one another, then the friction between them is called kinetic friction. For example, kinetic friction slows a hockey puck sliding on ice.
However, if two systems are in contact and are stationary relative to one...
20.5K
Dry Friction01:30

Dry Friction

1.3K
Dry friction occurs between two solid surfaces in contact as they attempt to move relative to one another. In daily life, dry friction is encountered in various forms, such as when walking on the ground, sliding an object across a table, or rubbing hands together. Despite its ubiquity, the underlying mechanisms behind dry friction are not readily visible.
To illustrate this concept, imagine a wooden crate resting on a rough, non-uniform horizontal surface. When an external force is applied to...
1.3K
Static Friction01:18

Static Friction

1.6K
Static friction is a force that opposes the relative motion or tendency of motion between two surfaces in contact. It plays a crucial role in our daily lives, from walking on the ground to driving a car.
For example, consider a scenario where a truck is connected to a car by a rope, ready to tow it along a road. When no external force is applied by the truck, the car remains stationary and is said to be in static equilibrium. In this case, the forces acting on the car, such as gravity and the...
1.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Control of Friction Laws in Tangential Adhesive Contacts by Surface Geometry.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Angle-Dependent Adhesive Mechanics in Hard-Soft Cylindrical Material Interfaces.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Molecular Dynamics Study of Bending Deformation of Mo<sub>2</sub>Ti<sub>2</sub>C<sub>3</sub> and Ti<sub>4</sub>C<sub>3</sub> (MXenes) Nanoribbons.

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

Initiation of decohesion between a flat punch and a thin bonded incompressible layer.

Mathematics and mechanics of solids : MMS·2024
Same author

Ad Hoc Modeling of Rate-Dependent Adhesion in Indentation Relaxation Testing.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

Effect of Indentation Depth on Friction Coefficient in Adhesive Contacts: Experiment and Simulation.

Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 5, 2026

Atomic Force Microscopy Cantilever-Based Nanoindentation: Mechanical Property Measurements at the Nanoscale in Air and Fluid
08:58

Atomic Force Microscopy Cantilever-Based Nanoindentation: Mechanical Property Measurements at the Nanoscale in Air and Fluid

Published on: December 2, 2022

3.5K

Contact stiffness of randomly rough surfaces.

Roman Pohrt1, Valentin L Popov

  • 1Technische Universität Berlin, Sekr. C8-4, Str. des 17. Juni 135, 10623 Berlin, Germany.

Scientific Reports
|November 22, 2013
PubMed
Summary

We studied how surface roughness affects contact stiffness. Stiffness follows a power law with normal force, with behavior varying based on roughness exponent H.

Area of Science:

  • Physics
  • Materials Science
  • Mechanical Engineering

Background:

  • Understanding contact mechanics is crucial for predicting the behavior of surfaces in contact.
  • Surface roughness significantly influences macroscopic contact properties like stiffness.
  • Existing models often simplify roughness, limiting their applicability to diverse surface topographies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between surface roughness and contact stiffness for an elastic half-space and a rigid indenter.
  • To analyze how different roughness parameters, characterized by the exponent H, affect contact stiffness.
  • To provide a comprehensive understanding of contact mechanics across various roughness regimes.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing a power spectrum C2D(q) proportional to q(-2H-2) to define surface roughness, where q is the wave vector.

More Related Videos

Experimental Multiscale Methodology for Predicting Material Fouling Resistance
09:13

Experimental Multiscale Methodology for Predicting Material Fouling Resistance

1.1K
Preparation and Friction Force Microscopy Measurements of Immiscible, Opposing Polymer Brushes
13:57

Preparation and Friction Force Microscopy Measurements of Immiscible, Opposing Polymer Brushes

Published on: December 24, 2014

15.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 5, 2026

Atomic Force Microscopy Cantilever-Based Nanoindentation: Mechanical Property Measurements at the Nanoscale in Air and Fluid
08:58

Atomic Force Microscopy Cantilever-Based Nanoindentation: Mechanical Property Measurements at the Nanoscale in Air and Fluid

Published on: December 2, 2022

3.5K
Experimental Multiscale Methodology for Predicting Material Fouling Resistance
09:13

Experimental Multiscale Methodology for Predicting Material Fouling Resistance

1.1K
Preparation and Friction Force Microscopy Measurements of Immiscible, Opposing Polymer Brushes
13:57

Preparation and Friction Force Microscopy Measurements of Immiscible, Opposing Polymer Brushes

Published on: December 24, 2014

15.1K
  • Analyzing contact stiffness across a wide range of the roughness exponent H, from white noise to smooth asperities.
  • Applying principles of three-dimensional contact mechanics and the method of dimensionality reduction (MDR) for interpretation.

    • Main Results:

    • Contact stiffness universally exhibits power-law dependence on normal force at low forces.
    • Three distinct regimes of behavior were identified based on the roughness exponent H: Hertzian (H > 2), Pohrt-Popov (0 < H < 2), and a distinct power law (H < 0).
    • For H < 0, a power law with an exponent near 0.9 was observed, influenced by the number of modes used to model the rough surface.

    Conclusions:

    • The study reveals a universal power-law relationship between contact stiffness and normal force, modulated by surface roughness.
    • Different roughness regimes (H > 2, 0 < H < 2, H < 0) lead to distinct contact mechanics behaviors.
    • The findings offer a more nuanced understanding of contact stiffness, applicable to a broader spectrum of surface topographies and contact conditions.