Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Resilient yet productive: maize that can thrive under stress and in optimal conditions.

Frontiers in plant science·2025
Same author

Single-Pulse X-ray Acoustic Computed Tomographic Imaging for Precision Radiation Therapy.

Advances in radiation oncology·2023
Same author

Spot delivery error predictions for intensity modulated proton therapy using robustness analysis with machine learning.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2023
Same author

Comparison of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), 3D conformal proton therapy and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for the treatment of metastatic brain cancer.

Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists·2023
Same author

Single pulse protoacoustic range verification using a clinical synchrocyclotron.

Physics in medicine and biology·2023
Same author

Dosimetric evaluation of the feasibility of utilizing a reduced number of interstitial needles in combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy for cervical cancer.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2022
Same journal

Synthetic CT-enabled weekly adaptive radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Optimizing plan adaptation triggers through volumetric-dosimetric monitoring.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2026
Same journal

Method for simultaneous selection of treatment isocenters and margins for polymetastatic extracranial stereotactic ablative radiotherapy.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2026
Same journal

Pulse‑level characterization of low monitor unit deliveries on a modern linear accelerator using a plastic scintillation detector.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2026
Same journal

Improving image quality in terbium-161 phantom imaging: Quantitative evaluation of DEW and TEW scatter correction methods.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2026
Same journal

Latent density discrepancies in commercial lung-equivalent inserts and their clinical dosimetric impact.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2026
Same journal

Explainable machine learning for patient-specific quality assurance in intensity-modulated radiotherapy based on anatomical structures.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 5, 2026

Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant
05:18

Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant

Published on: October 6, 2023

2.1K

A comprehensive comparison study of three different planar IMRT QA techniques using MapCHECK 2.

Vance P Keeling1, Salahuddin Ahmad, Hosang Jin

  • 1University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center. vance-keeling@ouhsc.edu.

Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
|November 22, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study compared three intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) quality assurance (QA) techniques using the MapCHECK 2 device. Results show that single gantry angle composite (SGAC) and field-by-field (FBF) techniques are comparable and less affected by modulation, unlike patient gantry angle composite (PGAC).

More Related Videos

Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System
08:25

Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System

Published on: April 11, 2018

17.7K
Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
07:57

Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform

Published on: March 24, 2022

2.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 5, 2026

Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant
05:18

Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant

Published on: October 6, 2023

2.1K
Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System
08:25

Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System

Published on: April 11, 2018

17.7K
Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
07:57

Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform

Published on: March 24, 2022

2.2K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Radiotherapy Quality Assurance

Background:

  • Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) requires rigorous quality assurance (QA) for safe and effective treatment delivery.
  • Planar IMRT QA techniques, including patient gantry angle composite (PGAC), single gantry angle composite (SGAC), and field by field (FBF), are used with devices like MapCHECK 2.
  • Assessing the comparability and dependencies of these QA techniques is crucial for clinical implementation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the comparability of PGAC, SGAC, and FBF planar IMRT QA techniques using the MapCHECK 2 device and gamma (γ) test metrics.
  • To evaluate the influence of intensity modulation, couch attenuation, and detector angular dependency on these QA techniques.
  • To determine the clinical relevance of observed differences in QA measurements.

Main Methods:

  • Ten head and neck (highly modulated) and ten prostate (moderately modulated) IMRT plans were delivered using PGAC, SGAC, and FBF techniques.
  • MapCHECK 2 measurements were analyzed using the γ test with criteria of 1%/1 mm (C1), 2%/2 mm (C2), and 3%/3 mm (C3).
  • The impact of treatment couch attenuation and MapCHECK 2 angular dependency was investigated through specific experimental setups and comparisons.

Main Results:

  • SGAC and FBF techniques demonstrated statistically insignificant differences in γ passing rates, while PGAC showed significant differences compared to them.
  • SGAC and FBF were less sensitive to intensity modulation differences between head and neck and prostate plans at C2 and C3 criteria.
  • The treatment couch significantly impacted PGAC γ passing rates, but ionization chamber measurements showed clinically insignificant dose errors (<2%). MapCHECK 2 exhibited significant angular dependency, particularly at 90° and 270° gantry angles.

Conclusions:

  • SGAC and FBF are clinically comparable planar IMRT QA techniques with MapCHECK 2, offering better performance with varying modulation levels than PGAC.
  • Couch attenuation and MapCHECK 2 angular dependency are critical factors affecting PGAC results and must be considered for accurate QA.
  • With appropriate adjustments for couch attenuation and beam arrangement, MapCHECK 2 can provide clinically comparable QA results across different planar IMRT techniques.