Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Implantation of the Syncardia Total Artificial Heart
Published on: July 18, 2014
Right ventricular failure after implantation of a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: early haemodynamic
Joakim Cordtz1, Jens C Nilsson, Peter B Hansen
1Department of Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology, The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Objectives:
Right ventricular failure (RVF) is a significant complication after implantation of a left ventricular assist device. We aimed to identify haemodynamic changes in the early postoperative phase that predicted subsequent development of RVF in a cohort of HeartMate II (HMII) implanted patients.
Methods:
This was a single-centre observational study of consecutive placement of HMII devices at Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen. Preoperative data (right heart catheterization, biochemistry and clinical status) and postoperative readings from the first 72 h after implantation (haemodynamics, inotropic and vasoactive therapy) were included in the analysis. The data set was examined for significant differences between patients who developed RVF (RVF group, n = 11)-defined as need for inotropic or vasodilator therapy >14 days, nitric oxide therapy ≥ 48 h or right ventricular assist device therapy-and those who did not (non-RVF group, n = 22).
Results:
Preoperative right heart catheterization data were similar in the two groups. Immediately after HMII implantation, the increase in cardiac index (CI) was significantly larger in the non-RVF than in the RVF group (0.96 ± 0.8 vs 0.2 ± 0.5 L/min, respectively; P = 0.018), whereas right ventricular stroke work index (RVSWI) decreased significantly more in the RVF group (-4.3 ± 2.0 vs -0.9 ± 2.0 g m/m(2); P < 0.001). These differences were present in spite of the RVF group receiving larger doses of catecholaminergic agents (P = 0.034). Over the ensuing 72 h, the CI of the RVF group gradually approached that of the non-RVF group; concurrently, however, the differences in inotropic therapy were further enhanced. Pump settings were similar in the two groups.
Conclusions:
The haemodynamic alterations characterizing RVF were present already immediately after HMII implantation. RVF development was not related to pump flow and settings.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care

