Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital
Published on: June 11, 2012
Pharmacoeconomic analysis of the diabetes initiative program: a pharmacist-physician collaborative care model
Brandi E Franklin1, Michelle Z Farland, Jeremy Thomas
1University of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Pharmacy, Memphis, TN, USA.
Background:
Diabetes treatment cost increased 41% from 2007 to 2011. Pharmacists have provided collaborative diabetes management for decades with improvement in disease-related end points. Few have reported economic benefits of pharmacist management of type 2 diabetes.
Objective:
The purpose was to determine if cost savings associated with hemoglobin A1c (A1C) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) change outweighed programmatic pharmacist-physician collaborative care model costs.
Methods:
This cost analysis of a 12 month, prospective, multicenter, observational study included English-speaking adults, 18 years or older, with type 2 diabetes mellitus, a life expectancy >1 year, and either a A1C >7%, SBP >130 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure >80 mm Hg, or low-density lipoprotein concentration >100 mg/dL. Pregnant patients were excluded. Primary analysis outcome was average cost per outcome, ratio of net cost (numerator) and percentage achieving outcomes (denominator). Assessment outcomes included A1C reduction by at least 1% and SBP reduction by at least 5.6 mm Hg.
Results:
206 patients were seen by pharmacists during 1612 encounters (mean = 7.8 encounters/patient). Pharmacists spent 983 hours caring for type 2 diabetes patients (mean 3.8 hours/patient). Base case net labor and program costs per patient were -$66.77 and $106.81, respectively. Improvement in A1C and SBP yielded $421.01 in cost savings per patient. Labor and program average costs per patient for each outcome achieved were -$100.40 and $160.61, respectively.
Conclusions:
This multisite pharmacist-physician collaboration in diabetes management showed cost savings when assessing pharmacist labor costs alone. Total program costs, including overhead, slightly increased cost of care.
Related Concept Videos
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Model Components
Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Problems
Pharmacodynamic Models: Overview
Diabetes: Management and Pharmacotherapy
Insulin remains the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with type 1 and many...
Pharmacodynamic Models: Direct Effect Model and Indirect Response Model
