Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Dynamic Digital Biomarkers of Motor and Cognitive Function in Parkinson's Disease
Published on: July 24, 2019
Clinical decision making-a functional medicine perspective
1Joseph E. Pizzorno, Jr, ND, is the editor in chief of the peer reviewed journal Integrative Medicine: A Clinician's Journal and coauthor of the critically acclaimed Textbook of Natural Medicine . He is the founding president of Bastyr University, vice chair of the board of the Institute for Functional Medicine, Gig Harbor, Washington, and chair of the science board for Bioclinic Naturals, Coquitlam, British Columbia, Canada.
Functional medicine offers personalized care but lacks standardized methods, leading to complex clinical decisions. Rigorous testing is needed for diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to ensure optimal patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Integrative and functional medicine
- Clinical decision-making in healthcare
Background:
- Healthcare is shifting towards patient-centric models addressing biochemical individuality.
- This shift complicates clinical decision-making due to a lack of standardized functional medicine approaches.
- Existing Western medicine has clear standards for disease assessment and treatment, unlike functional medicine.
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight the complexity of clinical decision-making in patient-centric healthcare.
- To address the lack of a clear standard for functional medicine approaches.
- To discuss the challenges posed by individualized diagnostic and therapeutic methods in functional medicine.
Main Methods:
- The study reviews the principles of functional medicine in contrast to traditional Western medicine.
- It examines the scientific basis and clinical testing of functional medicine's individualized approaches.
- Analysis of the implications of non-rigorous thinking and uncritical acceptance of diagnostic procedures and therapies.
Main Results:
- Functional medicine utilizes multiple, individualized diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.
- Many functional medicine approaches have sound scientific principles but lack rigorous testing.
- This has resulted in non-rigorous thinking and uncritical acceptance of unproven methods.
Conclusions:
- The complexity of functional medicine requires standardized evaluation and rigorous testing.
- Lack of standardization can lead to suboptimal clinical care and ineffective therapies.
- Further research is essential to validate functional medicine's diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.
Related Concept Videos
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
