Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

08:36
Collecting Sleep, Circadian, Fatigue, and Performance Data in Complex Operational Environments
Published on: August 8, 2019
13.3K
Optimal indolence: a normative microscopic approach to work and leisure
Ritwik K Niyogi1, Yannick-Andre Breton, Rebecca B Solomon
1Gatsby Computational Neuroscience Unit, University College London, , London, UK.
Journal of the Royal Society, Interface
|November 29, 2013
Summary
This study models the common decision of balancing work and leisure time using a control-theory approach. It explains how individuals choose between working for rewards and enjoying leisure, matching experimental observations.
Area of Science:
- Decision Science
- Behavioral Economics
- Control Theory
Background:
- Balancing work and leisure is a fundamental daily decision.
- Existing economic and psychological models offer partial explanations for this choice.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a unified normative control-theoretic framework for the work-leisure decision.
- To bridge economic and psychological perspectives on time allocation.
- To model and explain observed behavioral microfeatures in work-leisure choices.
Main Methods:
- A control-theoretic model was developed to analyze the work-leisure trade-off.
- The framework was applied to free-operant behavioral experiments.
- Analysis focused on situations where the benefit of leisure increases nonlinearly with duration.
Main Results:
- The model successfully generates behaviors that qualitatively match experimental data.
- It explains microfeatures of choice, such as leisure bout duration distributions.
- The model links microscopic choices to macroscopic behavioral patterns.
Conclusions:
- The control-theoretic approach provides a robust framework for understanding work-leisure decisions.
- Nonlinear leisure benefits are key to explaining observed choice patterns.
- The model offers a way to derive aggregate behavior from individual choices.
Related Concept Videos
Optimal Foraging
11.9K
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
11.9K
Social Loafing
29.3K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
29.3K
Quantifying Work
18.5K
As a system undergoes a change, its internal energy can change, and energy can be transferred from the system to the surroundings, or from the surroundings to the system.
18.5K
Optimal Arousal Theory
1.4K
The optimal arousal theory suggests that performance is maximized when an individual experiences a moderate level of arousal. This theory is closely tied to the Yerkes-Dodson law, which illustrates an inverted U-shaped relationship between arousal and performance. The law, formulated by psychologists Robert Yerkes and John Dodson, implies an ideal arousal level for optimal performance, and deviations from this level can lead to declines in effectiveness.
Inverted U-Shaped Performance Curve
The...
Inverted U-Shaped Performance Curve
The...
1.4K
High-Level and Low-Level Awareness
1.0K
Controlled processes in human consciousness represent high-alert mental states where individuals deliberately focus their attention on achieving specific goals. Controlled processes can be seen in situations like mastering new technology, where a person might become so absorbed that they ignore surrounding distractions. Such processes involve selective attention, requiring one to concentrate on particular elements of experience while disregarding others. These are governed by executive...
1.0K
Naturalistic Observations
15.2K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
15.2K

