Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Interpreting ¹H NMR Signal Splitting: The (n + 1) Rule01:10

Interpreting ¹H NMR Signal Splitting: The (n + 1) Rule

2.9K
In the AX proton spin system, proton A can sense the two spin states of a coupled proton X, resulting in a doublet NMR signal with two peaks of equal (1:1) intensity. When proton A is coupled to two equivalent protons (AX2 spin system), the spin states of each X can be aligned with or against the external field, creating three possible scenarios. This results in a 1:2:1  triplet signal, where the central peak corresponds to the chemical shift of A and is twice as large or intense as the...
2.9K
¹H NMR Signal Multiplicity: Splitting Patterns01:13

¹H NMR Signal Multiplicity: Splitting Patterns

7.0K
When protons A and X are coupled, their nuclear spin energy levels are slightly modified. This is because the energy required to excite proton A to a spin state parallel to proton X is slightly different from the energy required for it to become anti-parallel to spin X. Consequently, there are two possible excitation frequencies for A (A1 and A2), depending on the spin state of X, and vice versa. The mutual nature of coupling implies that the difference between frequencies A1 and A2, indicated...
7.0K
Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Overview01:03

Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Overview

1.9K
NMR-active nuclei have energy levels called 'spin states' that are associated with the orientations of their nuclear magnetic moments. In the absence of a magnetic field, the nuclear magnetic moments are randomly oriented, and the spin states are degenerate. When an external magnetic field is applied, the spin states have only 2 + 1 orientations available to them. A proton with = ½ has two available orientations. Similarly, for a quadrupolar nucleus with a nuclear spin value of one, the...
1.9K
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview01:08

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview

1.2K
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
1.2K
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling01:17

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

1.2K
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
1.2K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

1.5K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Controlled Chemical Synthesis of Color Centers in Nanocrystalline Silicon Carbide.

Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

High-Yield Engineering and Identification of Oxygen-Related Modified Divacancies in 4H-SiC.

Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)·2026
Same author

Experimental Observation of Spin Defects in the van der Waals Material GeS<sub>2</sub>.

Nano letters·2025
Same author

A coherence-protection scheme for quantum sensors based on ultra-shallow single nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Non-invasive bioinert room-temperature quantum sensor from silicon carbide qubits.

Nature materials·2025
Same author

Strain-Enhanced Spin Readout Contrast in Silicon Carbide Membranes.

Physical review letters·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 5, 2026

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser
09:00

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser

Published on: June 28, 2018

9.3K

The spin-spin zero-field splitting tensor in the projector-augmented-wave method.

Zoltán Bodrog1, Adam Gali

  • 1Wigner Research Center for Physics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, PO Box 49, H-1525 Budapest, Hungary.

Journal of Physics. Condensed Matter : an Institute of Physics Journal
|November 29, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The projector-augmented-wave method, a computational approach, now includes zero-field splitting calculations for electron spin interactions. This enhances its utility in materials science without increasing computational cost.

More Related Videos

Site Directed Spin Labeling and EPR Spectroscopic Studies of Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels
11:19

Site Directed Spin Labeling and EPR Spectroscopic Studies of Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels

Published on: July 4, 2016

9.9K
Measuring the Spin-Lattice Relaxation Magnetic Field Dependence of Hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate
11:57

Measuring the Spin-Lattice Relaxation Magnetic Field Dependence of Hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate

Published on: September 13, 2019

5.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 5, 2026

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser
09:00

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser

Published on: June 28, 2018

9.3K
Site Directed Spin Labeling and EPR Spectroscopic Studies of Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels
11:19

Site Directed Spin Labeling and EPR Spectroscopic Studies of Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels

Published on: July 4, 2016

9.9K
Measuring the Spin-Lattice Relaxation Magnetic Field Dependence of Hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate
11:57

Measuring the Spin-Lattice Relaxation Magnetic Field Dependence of Hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate

Published on: September 13, 2019

5.8K

Area of Science:

  • Computational materials science
  • Quantum chemistry
  • Condensed matter physics

Background:

  • The projector-augmented-wave (PAW) method is a pseudopotential-like approach in density functional theory.
  • PAW retains a connection to all-electron wavefunctions, offering a less approximate treatment than standard pseudopotentials.
  • Zero-field splitting (ZFS) is crucial for understanding electron spin behavior in materials.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To implement zero-field splitting (ZFS) calculations within the projector-augmented-wave (PAW) framework.
  • To provide the theoretical background and considerations for this novel implementation.
  • To extend the capabilities of PAW for studying spin-spin interactions.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical development for integrating ZFS calculations into PAW.
  • Focus on the spin-spin interaction energy component of ZFS.
  • Leveraging the existing PAW framework for computational efficiency.

Main Results:

  • Establishment of the theoretical foundation for PAW-based ZFS calculations.
  • Demonstration that ZFS can be computed within PAW.
  • PAW offers a computationally efficient alternative for ZFS.

Conclusions:

  • The implementation of ZFS calculations in PAW is feasible and beneficial.
  • This advancement expands the applicability of PAW to a wider range of spin-related phenomena.
  • Future work can build upon this foundation for advanced materials simulations.