Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Naturalistic Observations

Naturalistic Observations

If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...

Ethics in Research

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.

Quality Assurance

Quality Assurance

Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...

Blind Procedures

Blind Procedures

Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Extending the Single Case Analysis and Review Framework (SCARF-UI): A review and discussion.

Journal of applied behavior analysis·2025

Same author

A Novel Approach to Research Synthesis with the Distillation and Matching Model: Application to the Prevention of Youth Social, Emotional, and Behavioral Problems.

Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research·2025

Same author

Single-case design effect-size distributions: Association with procedural parameters.

School psychology (Washington, D.C.)·2024

Same author

Deriving relations at multiple levels of complexity following minimal instruction: A demonstration.

Journal of applied behavior analysis·2024

Same author

Centering Autistic Perspectives: Social Acceptability of Goals, Learning Contexts, and Procedures for Young Autistic Children.

Journal of autism and developmental disorders·2024

Same author

Comparing Interventions With Speech-Generating Devices and Other Augmentative and Alternative Communication Modes: A Meta-Analysis.

American journal of speech-language pathology·2023

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 5, 2026

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats

Published on: February 15, 2015

Measuring procedural fidelity in behavioural research.

Jennifer R Ledford¹, David L Gast

¹a Department of Communication Sciences and Special Education , University of Georgia , Athens , GA , USA.

Neuropsychological Rehabilitation

|November 30, 2013

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Ensuring procedural fidelity (PF) means research is done as planned. Careful measurement and reporting of PF data offer valuable insights for improving research effectiveness and application.

Keywords:

Data collection Procedural fidelity Reliability of implementation Single case research Treatment integrity

More Related Videos

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study

Published on: February 2, 2017

A Fully Automated Rodent Conditioning Protocol for Sensorimotor Integration and Cognitive Control Experiments

A Fully Automated Rodent Conditioning Protocol for Sensorimotor Integration and Cognitive Control Experiments

Published on: April 15, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 5, 2026

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats

Published on: February 15, 2015

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study

Published on: February 2, 2017

A Fully Automated Rodent Conditioning Protocol for Sensorimotor Integration and Cognitive Control Experiments

A Fully Automated Rodent Conditioning Protocol for Sensorimotor Integration and Cognitive Control Experiments

Published on: April 15, 2014

Area of Science:

Research Methodology
Evidence-Based Practice

Background:

Procedural fidelity (PF) is crucial for the accurate implementation of research plans.
Current practices often focus on minimum publication requirements rather than actionable insights.

Purpose of the Study:

To emphasize the importance of measuring procedural fidelity beyond publication mandates.
To provide guidance on effectively measuring and reporting procedural fidelity for practical application.

Main Methods:

Detailed planning for PF measurement, including defining key steps for each research condition.
Selection of appropriate measurement systems and analytical approaches.
Training observers, conducting observations, analyzing fidelity data, and identifying discrepancies.

Main Results:

Systematic measurement and reporting of PF data are essential for research integrity.
Proper PF assessment provides valuable information for researchers, implementers, and research consumers.

Conclusions:

Careful measurement and reporting of procedural fidelity enhance the understanding of intervention effectiveness.
This leads to better determination of which interventions work, for whom, and under specific conditions.