Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials
Valerie C Brueton1, Jayne Tierney, Sally Stenning
1Meta-analysis Group, MRC Clinical Trials Unit, 125 Kingsway, London, UK, WC2B 6NH.
Monetary incentives significantly improve participant retention in randomized trials, particularly for questionnaire responses. Further research is needed to evaluate other retention strategies across diverse trial settings.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Trials Methodology
- Evidence Synthesis
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Loss to follow-up in randomized trials compromises study power and generalizability.
- Effective strategies to improve participant retention are crucial but often unevaluated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify the impact of retention strategies on participant retention in randomized trials.
- To explore variations in strategy effectiveness based on trial type and setting.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of eligible retention trials embedded within host randomized trials.
- Inclusion of trials evaluating strategies to increase retention across all disease areas and settings.
- Data extraction on randomization methods, strategy type, comparators, and outcomes; risk ratios (RR) used for effectiveness evaluation.
Main Results:
- Monetary incentives (RR 1.18-1.25) and offers of monetary incentives significantly increased postal and electronic questionnaire response rates.
- Recorded delivery of questionnaires (RR 2.08) and a package of postal communication strategies (RR 1.43) also showed promise.
- Evidence for shorter questionnaires, disease-relevant questionnaires, non-monetary incentives, and priority post was unclear or inconclusive.
Conclusions:
- Monetary incentives are effective in improving questionnaire response rates in randomized trials.
- Few studies evaluated strategies for improving return to trial sites; further research is warranted.
- The applicability of findings depends on trial-specific factors like setting, population, and follow-up procedures.
More Related Videos
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
08:36Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
Published on: April 19, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Blinding
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Blind Procedures
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...