Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
Published on: June 5, 2016
The costs of giving up: action versus inaction asymmetries in regret
Antoinette Nicolle1, Kevin Riggs
1Department of Psychology, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, United Kingdom. a.nicolle@hull.ac.uk k.riggs@hull.ac.uk.
Abstract:
Kurzban et al.'s opportunity cost model of mental effort relies heavily on counterfactual thinking. We suggest that a closer inspection of the role of counterfactual emotions, and particularly of action/inaction asymmetries in anticipated regret, may be important in understanding the role of opportunity costs in decisions to persist with a current task.
More Related Videos
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
07:05Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
Published on: September 10, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Counterfactual Thinking
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Reason and Intuition
Social Exchange Theory
Social Exchange Theory
Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance