Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Do Medicare Advantage plans select enrollees in higher margin clinical categories?
Joseph P Newhouse1, J Michael McWilliams, Mary Price
1Harvard Kennedy School, United States; Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, United States; Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, United States.
Medicare Advantage (MA) plans
Area of Science:
- Health Economics
- Medical Care
- Public Health
Background:
- The Medicare Advantage (MA) risk adjustment system uses Traditional Medicare (TM) spending to set payment weights for MA plans.
- Differences in treatment patterns between MA and TM may lead to variations in profitability for beneficiaries with specific characteristics.
- Understanding these differences is crucial for accurate risk adjustment and equitable plan payments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether risk adjustment weights derived from MA spending differ from those based on TM spending.
- To analyze profit margins for different medical conditions within two MA-HMO plans.
- To assess whether beneficiary selection based on profitability (Hierarchical Condition Category - HCC) is occurring.
Main Methods:
- Compared spending data from two MA-HMO plans with TM spending data to calculate risk adjustment weights.
- Calculated profit margins (average revenue/average cost) for beneficiaries with 48 different medical condition combinations across the two plans.
- Examined the distribution of beneficiaries within high-margin HCCs in both plans and in Traditional Medicare.
Main Results:
- Risk adjustment weights calculated from MA spending significantly differed from those based on TM spending.
- Profit margins varied substantially across different medical conditions within both MA plans.
- Plans showed higher margins for conditions managed by primary care physicians and lower margins for conditions treated by specialists or acute conditions with limited management.
- Despite significant margin variations, no evidence of overrepresentation of beneficiaries in high-margin HCCs was found in either plan or in Traditional Medicare generally.
- Findings suggest potential for omitted interaction terms in Medicare's current risk adjustment model.
Conclusions:
- MA spending patterns create different risk adjustment weights compared to TM, impacting plan profitability.
- Profitability varies by condition, with primary care-managed conditions being more profitable than specialist-managed or acute conditions.
- Current risk adjustment models may not fully capture the complexities of MA plan costs and beneficiary risk.
- Further research is needed to explore the implications of these findings for Medicare policy and beneficiary outcomes.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...
Traditional Level Of Health Care System
The preventive healthcare service includes tests for screening. Preventive health care services include identifying and reducing disease risk...
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-I
Daycare centers
They provide several functions. Some facilities care for healthy newborns and children whose parents work, while others are medically focused and care for...
Secondary Healthcare System
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities

