Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Absolute Motion Analysis- General Plane Motion01:24

Absolute Motion Analysis- General Plane Motion

751
Visualize a drone, with its propellers spinning rapidly, hovering mid-air. The fascinating movements and operations of this drone can be comprehended by applying the principle of general plane motion.
As the drone's propellers rotate, an upward force is generated that counteracts the force of gravity, enabling the drone to lift off from the ground. This initial movement of the drone is along a straight path, representing a form of translational motion. In this phase, every point on the...
751
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes01:25

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes

1.0K
Consider a component AB undergoing a linear motion. Along with a linear motion, point B also rotates around point A. To comprehend this complex movement, position vectors for both points A and B are established using a stationary reference frame.
However, to express the relative position of point B relative to point A, an additional frame of reference, denoted as x'y', is necessary. This additional frame not only translates but also rotates relative to the fixed frame, making it...
1.0K
One-Degree-of-Freedom System01:24

One-Degree-of-Freedom System

1.0K
In mechanical engineering, one-degree-of-freedom systems form the basis of a wide range of electrical and mechanical components. Using these models, engineers can predict the behavior of various parts in a larger system, which gives them insight into how different forces interact with each other.
A one-degree-of-freedom system is defined by an independent variable that determines its state and behavior. One example of a one-degree-of-freedom system is a simple harmonic oscillator, such as a...
1.0K
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes - Acceleration01:22

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes - Acceleration

1.0K
Consider a component AB undergoing a linear motion. Along with a linear motion, point B also rotates around point A. To comprehend this complex movement, position vectors for both points A and B are established using a stationary reference frame. The absolute velocity of point B is determined by adding the absolute velocity of point A, the relative velocity of point B in the rotating frame, and the effects caused by the angular velocity within the rotating frame.
Time differentiation is...
1.0K
Kinematic Equations for Rotation01:30

Kinematic Equations for Rotation

1.1K
In mechanics, when one observes a rigid body in rotational motion with constant angular acceleration, it is possible to establish equations for its rotational kinematics. This process resembles how linear kinematics are dealt with in simpler motion studies.
For instance, imagine a point A on a rigid body engaged in circular motion. The translational velocity of this particular point can be calculated by taking the time derivatives of the displacement equation, which essentially measures the...
1.1K
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving01:29

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving

839
Consider a crane whose telescopic boom rotates with an angular velocity of 0.04 rad/s and angular acceleration of 0.02 rad/s2. Along with the rotation, the boom also extends linearly with a uniform speed of 5 m/s. The extension of the boom is measured at point D, which is measured with respect to the fixed point C on the other end of the boom. For the given instant, the distance between points C and D is 60 meters.
Here, in order to determine the magnitude of velocity and acceleration for point...
839

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cellular Senescence Links Muscle Atrophy and Posttraumatic Osteoarthritis after ACL Injury.

Function (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

Early Self-Efficacy Predicts Short- and Long-Term Pain and Functional Outcomes Following Surgically Treated Lower Extremity Fracture.

Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation·2026
Same author

Multimodal Imaging Reveals Rapid Catecholamine Uptake and Release by Neutrophils.

Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)·2026
Same author

Multi-omics analysis reveals sex-specific etiology of human muscle weakness following musculoskeletal injury.

BMC medicine·2026
Same author

Muscle atrophy after ACL reconstruction involves molecular mechanisms beyond unloading.

Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)·2026
Same author

Compensatory Movement Strategies during the Rearfoot Elevated Split Squat after ACL Reconstruction.

Medicine and science in sports and exercise·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 5, 2026

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
08:16

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

12.7K

Accuracy and repeatability of joint angles measured using a single camera markerless motion capture system.

Anne Schmitz1, Mao Ye2, Robert Shapiro3

  • 1Division of Physical Therapy, University of Kentucky, United States.

Journal of Biomechanics
|December 10, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Markerless motion capture systems accurately measure joint angles, showing high reliability comparable to marker-based systems. This advancement enables naturalistic human movement analysis for clinical applications.

Keywords:
Accuracy and reliabilityJoint anglesMicrosoft KinectMotion capture

More Related Videos

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography
06:09

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography

Published on: March 12, 2021

3.2K
Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb
08:24

Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb

Published on: August 30, 2016

10.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 5, 2026

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
08:16

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

12.7K
Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography
06:09

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography

Published on: March 12, 2021

3.2K
Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb
08:24

Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb

Published on: August 30, 2016

10.4K

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Human Movement Analysis
  • Motion Capture Technology

Background:

  • Markerless motion capture systems offer naturalistic human movement evaluation.
  • The accuracy and reliability of markerless systems require further investigation.
  • Advancements in markerless systems are crucial for clinical applications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Quantify the accuracy and repeatability of joint angle measurements using a single-camera markerless system.
  • Compare the performance of the markerless system against a marker-based system.
  • Establish the feasibility of markerless motion capture for clinical movement analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Collected marker trajectories using a 10-camera system and simultaneous depth/color data from a Kinect camera.
  • Calculated virtual marker trajectories and joint angles using successive body-fixed rotations.
  • Validated joint angles against a digital inclinometer for ground-truth measurements.

Main Results:

  • Markerless and marker-based systems achieved agreement within 0.5° for sagittal/frontal plane joint angles compared to inclinometer.
  • Inter-system agreement was within 0.5° for sagittal/frontal planes and 2° for transverse plane.
  • Both systems demonstrated a coefficient of reliability below 0.5° for all measured angles.

Conclusions:

  • A single-camera markerless motion capture system demonstrates feasibility for accurate lower extremity kinematic measurement.
  • Markerless systems show comparable accuracy and reliability to marker-based systems.
  • This technology serves as a foundational step for identifying clinical differences in patient joint kinematics.