[The core of solidarity]

Area of Science:

• Social Sciences
• Public Health Policy
• Sociology

Background:

• The welfare state model faces criticism, with arguments for a shift towards individual participation and personalized care.
• Concerns are raised about the feasibility of maintaining boundaries and the extent of altruism required from higher-income individuals within the current system.

Discussion:

• This analysis challenges the notion that organized solidarity within a welfare state is inherently impersonal or solely based on self-interest.
• It highlights that many individuals prefer professional healthcare over familial or volunteer support, indicating a continued need for structured care systems.
• Recent advancements in the medical profession suggest that re-establishing boundaries within care provision is achievable.

Key Insights:

• Despite higher financial contributions from the educated, individuals with lower educational attainment exhibit more frequent and active solidarity.
• The preference for professional care over informal support networks is a significant factor in evaluating the welfare state's relevance.
• Evidence suggests that the welfare state is not obsolete and that calls for a complete transition to individual participation are premature.

Outlook:

• Further research into the evolving dynamics of solidarity and care preferences is warranted.
• Policy discussions should consider the demonstrated value of organized solidarity and professional care in contemporary society.
• The findings support the continued relevance and potential adaptation of the welfare state model.