Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
Published on: June 5, 2016
Underestimating our influence over others' unethical behavior and decisions
Vanessa K Bohns1, M Mahdi Roghanizad, Amy Z Xu
11University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract:
We examined the psychology of "instigators," people who surround an unethical act and influence the wrongdoer (the "actor") without directly committing the act themselves. In four studies, we found that instigators of unethical acts underestimated their influence over actors. In Studies 1 and 2, university students enlisted other students to commit a "white lie" (Study 1) or commit a small act of vandalism (Study 2) after making predictions about how easy it would be to get their fellow students to do so. In Studies 3 and 4, online samples of participants responded to hypothetical vignettes, for example, about buying children alcohol and taking office supplies home for personal use. In all four studies, instigators failed to recognize the social pressure they levied on actors through simple unethical suggestions, that is, the discomfort actors would experience by making a decision that was inconsistent with the instigator's suggestion.
More Related Videos
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
06:11High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex to Enhance Metacognitive Sensitivity
Published on: September 26, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Unrealistic Optimism Bias
Fundamental Attribution Error
Motivational Bias
Self-Serving Bias
Correspondence Bias
Introspection