Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

4.1K
Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
4.1K
Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

1.1K
1.1K
Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

11.9K
Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
11.9K
Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

6.0K
6.0K
Protein-protein Interfaces02:04

Protein-protein Interfaces

12.5K
Many proteins form complexes to carry out their functions, making protein-protein interactions (PPIs) essential for an organism's survival. Most PPIs are stabilized by numerous weak noncovalent chemical forces. The physical shape of the interfaces determines the way two proteins interact. Many globular proteins have closely-matching shapes on their surfaces, which form a large number of weak bonds. Additionally, many PPIs occur between two helices or between a surface cleft and a...
12.5K
Ligand Binding and Linkage00:49

Ligand Binding and Linkage

4.4K
Allosteric proteins have more than one ligand binding site; the binding of a ligand to any of these sites influences the binding of ligands to the other sites. When a protein is allosteric, its binding sites are called coupled or linked.  In the case of enzymes, the site that binds to the substrate is known as the active site and the other site is known as the regulatory site. When a ligand binds to the regulatory site, this leads to conformational changes in the protein that can influence...
4.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Many ligands and states of bitter taste GPCRs.

Nature structural & molecular biology·2026
Same author

Intracellular and dual-site inhibition of a bitter taste GPCR.

Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS·2026
Same author

The Open Molecular Software Foundation (OMSF) and the Growing Role of Open Source Software in Molecular Modeling.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same author

Toward Automated Physics-Based Absolute Drug Residence Time Predictions.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2025
Same author

Accelerated <i>In Silico</i> Discovery of <b>SGR-1505</b>: A Potent MALT1 Allosteric Inhibitor for the Treatment of Mature B-Cell Malignancies.

Journal of medicinal chemistry·2025
Same author

In Search of Beautiful Molecules: A Perspective on Generative Modeling for Drug Design.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2025
Same journal

Mapping Evolution of Molecules across Biochemistry with Assembly Theory.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

Structural Proteomics-Based Deciphering of Hydrophobic Packing Fingerprints Informing Protein Thermostability in TIM Barrels.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

Bridging between Structure-Based and Data-Driven Affinity Prediction.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

Reinforcement Learning-Driven Multiproperty Optimization in Molecular Design Using Multicontext Transcriptome Data.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

EnsembleCycPerm: Interpretable Modeling of Cyclic Peptide Permeability through Solvent-Dependent Conformational Ensembles.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

Resolving Conformational Preferences of Monosaccharides from <sup>1</sup>H and <sup>13</sup>C NMR Chemical Shifts Using an Integrated MD and QM Approach.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 4, 2026

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.8K

Predicting GPCR promiscuity using binding site features.

Anat Levit1, Thijs Beuming, Goran Krilov

  • 1Institute of Biochemistry, Food Science and Nutrition, Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture Food and Environment, The Hebrew University , Rehovot 76100, Israel.

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
|December 17, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Researchers identified key features governing G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) ligand diversity. Binding site hydrophobicity and hydrogen bonding, along with receptor disulfide bridges, predict antagonist chemical variability and size selectivity.

More Related Videos

PAR-CliP - A Method to Identify Transcriptome-wide the Binding Sites of RNA Binding Proteins
12:24

PAR-CliP - A Method to Identify Transcriptome-wide the Binding Sites of RNA Binding Proteins

Published on: July 2, 2010

55.6K
Exploring Sequence Space to Identify Binding Sites for Regulatory RNA-Binding Proteins
11:34

Exploring Sequence Space to Identify Binding Sites for Regulatory RNA-Binding Proteins

Published on: August 9, 2019

5.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 4, 2026

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.8K
PAR-CliP - A Method to Identify Transcriptome-wide the Binding Sites of RNA Binding Proteins
12:24

PAR-CliP - A Method to Identify Transcriptome-wide the Binding Sites of RNA Binding Proteins

Published on: July 2, 2010

55.6K
Exploring Sequence Space to Identify Binding Sites for Regulatory RNA-Binding Proteins
11:34

Exploring Sequence Space to Identify Binding Sites for Regulatory RNA-Binding Proteins

Published on: August 9, 2019

5.8K

Area of Science:

  • Biochemistry
  • Structural Biology
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are crucial signaling proteins with numerous therapeutic applications.
  • GPCR ligands exhibit significant chemical diversity, even for the same receptor, posing challenges for drug development.
  • Understanding the structural basis of GPCR ligand recognition is essential for targeted drug design.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To elucidate the structural and chemical determinants of GPCR promiscuity towards diverse ligands.
  • To develop a predictive model for GPCR ligand binding characteristics.

Main Methods:

  • Statistical analysis of over 30 sequence, physicochemical, structural, and energetic descriptors of GPCR binding sites.
  • Correlation analysis between binding site properties and ligand chemical variability.
  • Analysis of receptor extracellular disulfide bridges and their impact on antagonist size selectivity.

Main Results:

  • GPCR antagonist chemical variability significantly correlates with binding site hydrophobicity and inversely correlates with hydrogen bond donors.
  • The number of extracellular disulfide bridges in GPCRs inversely correlates with the molecular weight range of their antagonists.
  • A predictive model for GPCR ligand selectivity was developed and validated using diverse GPCR structures.

Conclusions:

  • Binding site physicochemical properties and extracellular structural features dictate GPCR ligand selectivity.
  • These findings provide insights into GPCR-ligand interactions, aiding in the design of more specific therapeutics.
  • The study highlights the importance of both binding site and extracellular regions in determining GPCR antagonist profiles.