Evaluating methodological assumptions in comparative effectiveness research: overcoming pitfalls
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Demissie Alemayehu1, Joseph C Cappelleri
1Pfizer Inc., 219 East 42nd Street, New York, NY 10017, USA.
Abstract:
The scope of comparative effectiveness research (CER) is wide and therefore requires the application of complex statistical tools and nonstandard procedures. The commonly used methods presuppose the realization of important, and often untestable, assumptions pertaining to the underlying distribution, study heterogeneity and targeted population. Accordingly, the value of the results obtained based on such tools is in large part dependent on the validity of the underlying assumptions relating to the operating characteristics of the procedures. In this article, we elucidate some of the pitfalls that may arise with use of the most commonly used techniques, including those that are applied in network meta-analysis, observational data analysis and patient-reported outcome evaluation. In addition, reference is made to the impact of data quality and database heterogeneity on the performance of commonly used CER tools and the need for standards in order to inform researchers engaged in CER.
More Related Videos
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
06:05The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...