Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
The effects of different IV fat emulsions on clinical outcomes in critically ill patients
Christina E Edmunds1, Rebecca A Brody, J Scott Parrott
11Food and Nutrition Services Department, Fraser Health Authority, Burnaby, BC, Canada. 2Department of Nutritional Sciences, School of Health Related Professions, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, NJ. 3Clinical Evaluation Research Unit, Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, ON, Canada. 4Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Objective:
To examine the effects of different IV fat emulsions on clinical outcomes in critically ill patients.
Design:
Secondary analysis of data from a prospective multicenter study.
Setting:
An international sample of ICUs.
Patients:
Adult patients who were admitted to the ICU for more than 72 hours, were mechanically ventilated within 48 hours, received exclusive parenteral nutrition for more than or equal to 5 days, and did not change IV fat emulsion type during the data collection period.
Interventions:
Demographic and clinical data were collected for up to 12 days, until death, or discharge from the ICU, whichever came first. Clinical outcomes were recorded at 60 days following ICU admission.
Measurements:
Lipid-free, soybean, medium-chain triglyceride, olive, and fish oils in parenteral nutrition were compared using an adjusted Cox proportional hazard model to examine time to termination of mechanical ventilation alive, time to ICU discharge alive, and time to hospital discharge alive.
Main Results:
A total of 451 patients were included in this study: 70 (15.5%) in the lipid-free group, 223 (49.5%) in the soybean oil group, 65 (14.4%) in the medium-chain triglyceride group, 74 (16.4%) in the olive oil group, and 19 (4.9%) in the fish oil group. When compared with lipid-free parenteral nutrition, patients who received fish oil had a faster time to ICU discharge alive (hazard ratio, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.01-3.34; p = 0.05). When compared with soybean oil, patients who received olive oil or fish oil had a shorter time to termination of mechanical ventilation alive (hazard ratio, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.06-1.93; p = 0.02 and hazard ratio, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.00-2.81; p = 0.05, respectively) and a shorter time to ICU discharge alive (hazard ratio, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.30-2.39; p < 0.001 and hazard ratio, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.43-4.03; p = 0.001, respectively).
Conclusions:
Use of alternative IV fat emulsions in parenteral nutrition, particularly olive and fish oil, was associated with improved clinical outcomes.
More Related Videos
10:38Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
Published on: January 16, 2019
09:17Use of a Central Venous Line for Fluids, Drugs and Nutrient Administration in a Mouse Model of Critical Illness
Published on: May 2, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence
Modified-Release Drug Delivery Systems: Bioavailability
Drug Accumulation During Multiple Dosing: Intermittent IV Infusions
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients